PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JGYIX vs. AIVSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JGYIX vs. AIVSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Global Shareholder Yield Fund (JGYIX) and American Funds Investment Company of America Class A (AIVSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JGYIX achieves a 17.92% return, which is significantly higher than AIVSX's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, JGYIX has underperformed AIVSX with an annualized return of 10.12%, while AIVSX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.27% annualized return.


JGYIX

1D
0.27%
1M
5.17%
YTD
17.92%
6M
19.56%
1Y
32.58%
3Y*
21.68%
5Y*
12.88%
10Y*
10.12%

AIVSX

1D
0.32%
1M
4.89%
YTD
10.91%
6M
11.20%
1Y
27.39%
3Y*
24.21%
5Y*
14.97%
10Y*
14.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JGYIX vs. AIVSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JGYIX
John Hancock Global Shareholder Yield Fund
17.92%24.13%14.38%11.36%-4.87%17.65%-1.36%20.86%-9.27%16.72%
AIVSX
American Funds Investment Company of America Class A
10.91%20.47%24.90%28.56%-15.50%25.10%14.47%24.10%-8.21%19.54%

Correlation

The correlation between JGYIX and AIVSX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2007

0.88

Over the past year, the correlation between JGYIX and AIVSX has dropped to 0.67 - well below their long-term average of 0.88, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JGYIX vs. AIVSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JGYIX
JGYIX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
JGYIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JGYIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
JGYIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
JGYIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
JGYIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

AIVSX
AIVSX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
AIVSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIVSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIVSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
AIVSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIVSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JGYIX vs. AIVSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Global Shareholder Yield Fund (JGYIX) and American Funds Investment Company of America Class A (AIVSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JGYIXAIVSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.35

2.28

+1.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.58

3.11

+1.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.42

+0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.82

2.81

+2.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.60

12.79

+6.81

JGYIX vs. AIVSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JGYIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.35, which is higher than the AIVSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JGYIX and AIVSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JGYIXAIVSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.35

2.28

+1.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

0.94

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.86

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.70

-0.23

Drawdowns

JGYIX vs. AIVSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JGYIX drawdown since its inception was -46.76%, smaller than the maximum AIVSX drawdown of -50.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JGYIX and AIVSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JGYIXAIVSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.76%

-50.90%

+4.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.96%

-10.08%

+3.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.99%

-17.40%

+5.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.97%

-24.31%

+5.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.45%

-31.09%

-5.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.77%

-5.91%

-0.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

2.22%

-0.51%

Volatility

JGYIX vs. AIVSX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Global Shareholder Yield Fund (JGYIX) and American Funds Investment Company of America Class A (AIVSX) have volatilities of 3.27% and 3.25%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JGYIXAIVSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.27%

3.25%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.65%

9.73%

-2.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.00%

12.48%

-2.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.21%

16.00%

-2.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.99%

16.58%

-1.59%

JGYIX vs. AIVSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JGYIX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than AIVSX's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

JGYIX vs. AIVSX - Dividend Comparison

JGYIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.41%, more than AIVSX's 9.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIVSX
American Funds Investment Company of America Class A
9.58%10.60%9.29%4.96%6.12%6.94%1.65%6.15%9.61%7.08%5.48%8.95%
JGYIX
John Hancock Global Shareholder Yield Fund
11.41%13.30%8.21%4.37%9.51%11.27%2.71%4.81%6.31%2.91%3.19%7.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


JGYIX and AIVSX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JGYIX has higher volatility (3.27%) compared to AIVSX (3.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JGYIX dropped -46.76% vs AIVSX's -50.90%.

JGYIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JGYIX and AIVSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer