JGLTX vs. FDTRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX) and Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 (FDTRX).
JGLTX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Jan 17, 2000. FDTRX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jun 24, 2013.
Performance
JGLTX vs. FDTRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JGLTX vs. FDTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JGLTX Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio | -10.57% | 25.19% | 32.10% | 54.55% | -36.42% | 18.28% | 50.42% | 45.29% | 1.17% | 45.17% |
FDTRX Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 | -15.17% | 18.97% | 31.01% | 44.92% | -40.07% | 12.90% | 58.22% | 36.84% | 3.22% | 39.87% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JGLTX achieves a -10.57% return, which is significantly higher than FDTRX's -15.17% return. Over the past 10 years, JGLTX has outperformed FDTRX with an annualized return of 20.23%, while FDTRX has yielded a comparatively lower 15.79% annualized return.
JGLTX
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- -10.72%
- YTD
- -10.57%
- 6M
- -9.78%
- 1Y
- 24.46%
- 3Y*
- 23.30%
- 5Y*
- 11.02%
- 10Y*
- 20.23%
FDTRX
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- -9.28%
- YTD
- -15.17%
- 6M
- -15.64%
- 1Y
- 15.24%
- 3Y*
- 17.63%
- 5Y*
- 5.79%
- 10Y*
- 15.79%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JGLTX vs. FDTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JGLTX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than FDTRX's 0.48% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JGLTX vs. FDTRX — Risk / Return Rank
JGLTX
FDTRX
JGLTX vs. FDTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX) and Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 (FDTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JGLTX | FDTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.95 | 0.56 | +0.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.46 | 0.98 | +0.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.13 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 0.49 | +0.80 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.44 | 1.61 | +2.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JGLTX | FDTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 | 0.56 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.22 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | 0.65 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.65 | -0.35 |
Correlation
The correlation between JGLTX and FDTRX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JGLTX vs. FDTRX - Dividend Comparison
JGLTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.04%, less than FDTRX's 12.24% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JGLTX Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio | 10.04% | 8.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 26.96% | 14.48% | 7.71% | 6.81% | 4.95% | 5.68% | 3.71% | 16.11% |
FDTRX Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 | 12.24% | 10.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.36% | 0.00% | 0.71% | 2.80% | 1.71% | 3.44% | 2.40% |
Drawdowns
JGLTX vs. FDTRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JGLTX drawdown since its inception was -81.78%, which is greater than FDTRX's maximum drawdown of -48.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JGLTX and FDTRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JGLTX | FDTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.78% | -48.10% | -33.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.81% | -20.39% | +4.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.18% | -48.10% | +2.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.18% | -48.10% | +2.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.81% | -20.39% | +4.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.83% | -9.22% | -27.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.58% | 6.24% | -1.66% |
Volatility
JGLTX vs. FDTRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX) is 6.94%, while Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 (FDTRX) has a volatility of 7.58%. This indicates that JGLTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JGLTX | FDTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.94% | 7.58% | -0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.62% | 16.06% | -0.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.03% | 26.05% | -1.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.89% | 26.20% | -0.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.28% | 24.48% | -0.20% |