JGLO vs. WDIV
JGLO (Jpmorgan Global Select Equity ETF) and WDIV (SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF) are both Global Equities funds. JGLO is actively managed, while WDIV is passively managed. Over the past year, JGLO returned 13.14% vs 19.92% for WDIV. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JGLO charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for WDIV.
Performance
JGLO vs. WDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JGLO achieves a 3.31% return, which is significantly lower than WDIV's 7.89% return.
JGLO
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- -1.33%
- YTD
- 3.31%
- 6M
- 2.82%
- 1Y
- 13.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WDIV
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -0.69%
- YTD
- 7.89%
- 6M
- 7.85%
- 1Y
- 19.92%
- 3Y*
- 17.68%
- 5Y*
- 7.89%
- 10Y*
- 7.81%
JGLO vs. WDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
JGLO Jpmorgan Global Select Equity ETF | 3.31% | 14.07% | 17.00% | 8.01% |
WDIV SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF | 7.89% | 27.16% | 7.61% | 8.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between JGLO and WDIV is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2023 | 0.66 |
The correlation between JGLO and WDIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
JGLO vs. WDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JGLO
WDIV
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Industrials
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Technology
JGLO
WDIV
Financial Services
JGLO
WDIV
Consumer Cyclical
JGLO
WDIV
Healthcare
JGLO
WDIV
Communication Services
JGLO
WDIV
Industrials
JGLO
WDIV
Energy
JGLO
WDIV
Utilities
JGLO
WDIV
Basic Materials
JGLO
WDIV
Real Estate
JGLO
WDIV
Consumer Defensive
JGLO
WDIV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JGLO vs. WDIV — Risk / Return Rank
JGLO
WDIV
JGLO vs. WDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jpmorgan Global Select Equity ETF (JGLO) and SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JGLO | WDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.35 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.39 | 2.32 | -0.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.59 | 8.53 | -2.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JGLO vs. WDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JGLO drawdown since its inception was -16.12%, smaller than the maximum WDIV drawdown of -42.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JGLO and WDIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JGLO | WDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.12% | -42.34% | +26.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.47% | -8.61% | -0.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.43% | -1.94% | -0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.88% | -5.83% | +3.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.35% | 2.34% | +0.01% |
Volatility
JGLO vs. WDIV - Volatility Comparison
Jpmorgan Global Select Equity ETF (JGLO) has a higher volatility of 4.77% compared to SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) at 3.05%. This indicates that JGLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JGLO | WDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.77% | 3.05% | +1.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.99% | 8.32% | +1.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.24% | 10.29% | +1.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.17% | 12.77% | +1.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.17% | 15.24% | -1.07% |
JGLO vs. WDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
JGLO has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than WDIV's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
JGLO vs. WDIV - Dividend Comparison
JGLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than WDIV's 4.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JGLO Jpmorgan Global Select Equity ETF | 1.16% | 1.20% | 2.00% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WDIV SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF | 4.29% | 4.27% | 4.63% | 4.73% | 5.12% | 4.15% | 5.55% | 3.99% | 4.42% | 3.62% | 4.32% | 5.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JGLO and WDIV have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JGLO has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to WDIV (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JGLO dropped -16.12% vs WDIV's -42.34%.
On 1-year performance, WDIV leads with 19.92% vs 13.14% for JGLO. On fees, WDIV is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, WDIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, WDIV has performed better with a 19.92% return vs 13.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
WDIV is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for JGLO.
WDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.29%, compared with 1.16% for JGLO.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for JGLO and 0.40% for WDIV.
WDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JGLO and WDIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer