JFR vs. PRCPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fund (JFR) and T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund (PRCPX).
JFR is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on Mar 24, 2004. PRCPX is a passively managed fund by T. Rowe Price that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US High-Yield 2% Issuer Capped Bond Index. It was launched on Apr 29, 2014.
Performance
JFR vs. PRCPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JFR vs. PRCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JFR Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fund | -0.82% | -0.68% | 21.92% | 16.61% | -15.15% | 24.66% | -8.05% | 19.65% | -11.69% | 2.94% |
PRCPX T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund | -0.13% | 14.80% | 7.46% | 14.90% | -10.50% | 6.36% | 5.55% | 13.77% | -1.44% | 6.80% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JFR achieves a -0.82% return, which is significantly lower than PRCPX's -0.13% return. Over the past 10 years, JFR has underperformed PRCPX with an annualized return of 6.13%, while PRCPX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.83% annualized return.
JFR
- 1D
- 3.87%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- -0.82%
- 6M
- -1.94%
- 1Y
- 0.69%
- 3Y*
- 9.60%
- 5Y*
- 5.55%
- 10Y*
- 6.13%
PRCPX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- -0.13%
- 6M
- 3.02%
- 1Y
- 13.68%
- 3Y*
- 10.60%
- 5Y*
- 5.87%
- 10Y*
- 6.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JFR vs. PRCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JFR has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than PRCPX's 0.81% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JFR vs. PRCPX — Risk / Return Rank
JFR
PRCPX
JFR vs. PRCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fund (JFR) and T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund (PRCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JFR | PRCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.05 | 3.47 | -3.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.16 | 5.52 | -5.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.93 | -0.90 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.08 | 4.53 | -4.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.26 | 21.08 | -20.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JFR | PRCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 | 3.47 | -3.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 1.23 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 1.26 | -0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.88 | -0.61 |
Correlation
The correlation between JFR and PRCPX is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
JFR vs. PRCPX - Dividend Comparison
JFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.47%, more than PRCPX's 12.89% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JFR Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fund | 13.47% | 13.03% | 11.43% | 11.51% | 9.61% | 6.66% | 7.19% | 7.19% | 7.95% | 7.23% | 6.38% | 7.03% |
PRCPX T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund | 12.89% | 12.19% | 7.03% | 7.88% | 4.89% | 5.11% | 5.36% | 5.18% | 5.72% | 4.95% | 5.88% | 7.58% |
Drawdowns
JFR vs. PRCPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JFR drawdown since its inception was -62.61%, which is greater than PRCPX's maximum drawdown of -23.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JFR and PRCPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JFR | PRCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.61% | -23.07% | -39.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.54% | -3.03% | -8.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.40% | -14.34% | -6.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.71% | -23.07% | -24.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.15% | -1.74% | -2.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.84% | -3.16% | -5.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.53% | 0.65% | +2.88% |
Volatility
JFR vs. PRCPX - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fund (JFR) has a higher volatility of 4.96% compared to T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund (PRCPX) at 1.10%. This indicates that JFR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JFR | PRCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.96% | 1.10% | +3.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.07% | 2.52% | +4.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.16% | 4.11% | +9.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.73% | 4.79% | +7.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.65% | 5.45% | +11.20% |