PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JFR vs. NWQIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JFR vs. NWQIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fund (JFR) and Nuveen Flexible Income Fund (NWQIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JFR achieves a 6.22% return, which is significantly higher than NWQIX's 5.34% return. Over the past 10 years, JFR has outperformed NWQIX with an annualized return of 5.89%, while NWQIX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.24% annualized return.


JFR

1D
0.26%
1M
1.28%
6M
4.95%
YTD
6.22%
1Y
3.12%
3Y*
11.26%
5Y*
6.35%
10Y*
5.89%
ALL TIME*
4.94%

NWQIX

1D
0.52%
1M
-0.47%
6M
3.53%
YTD
5.34%
1Y
11.57%
3Y*
10.02%
5Y*
4.03%
10Y*
5.24%
ALL TIME*
5.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.86M$3.71M$4.50M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

JFR vs. NWQIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JFR
Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fund
6.22%-0.68%21.92%16.61%-15.15%24.66%-8.05%19.65%-11.69%2.94%
NWQIX
Nuveen Flexible Income Fund
5.34%11.74%6.03%11.61%-13.64%4.94%5.54%18.57%-4.07%9.18%

Correlation

The correlation between JFR and NWQIX is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2010

0.36

The correlation between JFR and NWQIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JFR vs. NWQIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JFR
JFR Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
JFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
JFR Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
JFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
JFR Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

NWQIX
NWQIX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
NWQIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWQIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWQIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
NWQIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWQIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JFR vs. NWQIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fund (JFR) and Nuveen Flexible Income Fund (NWQIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JFRNWQIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.61

-0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.36

3.95

-3.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.94

17.80

-16.86

JFR vs. NWQIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JFR Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the NWQIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JFR and NWQIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JFR vs. NWQIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JFR drawdown since its inception was -62.61%, which is greater than NWQIX's maximum drawdown of -23.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JFR and NWQIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JFRNWQIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.61%

-23.89%

-38.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.62%

-2.94%

-5.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.29%

-4.59%

-10.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.40%

-17.75%

-2.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.71%

-23.89%

-23.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.62%

+0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.73%

-2.98%

-5.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

0.65%

+2.67%

Volatility

JFR vs. NWQIX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fund (JFR) has a higher volatility of 1.83% compared to Nuveen Flexible Income Fund (NWQIX) at 0.96%. This indicates that JFR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NWQIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JFRNWQIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.83%

0.96%

+0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.02%

3.19%

+3.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.64%

3.99%

+4.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.72%

5.70%

+7.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.61%

6.29%

+10.32%

JFR vs. NWQIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JFR has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than NWQIX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

JFR vs. NWQIX - Dividend Comparison

JFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.74%, more than NWQIX's 5.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JFR
Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fund
12.74%13.03%11.43%11.51%9.61%6.66%7.19%7.19%7.95%7.23%6.38%7.03%
NWQIX
Nuveen Flexible Income Fund
5.55%6.09%5.20%7.84%7.02%4.39%4.82%5.71%6.23%5.67%5.52%5.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


JFR and NWQIX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JFR has higher volatility (1.83%) compared to NWQIX (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JFR dropped -62.61% vs NWQIX's -23.89%.

NWQIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JFR and NWQIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer