JFR vs. IGLD
JFR (Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fund) and IGLD (FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF) are both funds - JFR is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by Nuveen, while IGLD is a Precious Metals fund actively managed by First Trust. Over the past 5 years, JFR returned 5.93%/yr vs 13.20%/yr for IGLD. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JFR charges 0.02%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for IGLD.
Performance
JFR vs. IGLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with JFR having a 2.59% return and IGLD slightly lower at 2.52%.
JFR
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 2.79%
- YTD
- 2.59%
- 6M
- 3.06%
- 1Y
- 3.83%
- 3Y*
- 11.93%
- 5Y*
- 5.93%
- 10Y*
- 5.84%
IGLD
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- -0.97%
- YTD
- 2.52%
- 6M
- 5.30%
- 1Y
- 25.16%
- 3Y*
- 23.03%
- 5Y*
- 13.20%
- 10Y*
- —
JFR vs. IGLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JFR Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fund | 2.59% | -0.68% | 21.92% | 16.61% | -15.15% | 13.49% |
IGLD FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF | 2.52% | 47.46% | 19.36% | 9.24% | -2.34% | 4.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between JFR and IGLD is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2021 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JFR vs. IGLD — Risk / Return Rank
JFR
IGLD
JFR vs. IGLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fund (JFR) and FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JFR | IGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.23 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.45 | 1.44 | -0.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.16 | 3.88 | -2.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JFR | IGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 | 1.09 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.87 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.95 | -0.67 |
Drawdowns
JFR vs. IGLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JFR drawdown since its inception was -62.61%, which is greater than IGLD's maximum drawdown of -18.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JFR and IGLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JFR | IGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.61% | -18.59% | -44.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.62% | -17.56% | +8.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.29% | -17.56% | +2.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.40% | -18.59% | -1.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.86% | -14.46% | +13.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.79% | -5.25% | -3.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.32% | 6.49% | -3.17% |
Volatility
JFR vs. IGLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fund (JFR) is 1.71%, while FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD) has a volatility of 5.17%. This indicates that JFR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JFR | IGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.71% | 5.17% | -3.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.07% | 21.01% | -13.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.52% | 23.24% | -14.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.81% | 15.17% | -2.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.65% | 15.00% | +1.65% |
JFR vs. IGLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
JFR has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than IGLD's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
JFR vs. IGLD - Dividend Comparison
JFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.11%, less than IGLD's 17.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGLD FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF | 17.77% | 9.91% | 20.81% | 7.85% | 4.45% | 2.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JFR Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fund | 13.11% | 13.03% | 11.43% | 11.51% | 9.61% | 6.66% | 7.19% | 7.19% | 7.95% | 7.23% | 6.38% | 7.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JFR and IGLD have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGLD has higher volatility (5.17%) compared to JFR (1.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JFR dropped -62.61% vs IGLD's -18.59%.
IGLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JFR and IGLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer