JFR vs. GHY
JFR (Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fund) and GHY (PGIM Global High Yield Fund) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, JFR returned 6.32%/yr vs 7.21%/yr for GHY. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JFR charges 0.02%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for GHY.
Performance
JFR vs. GHY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JFR achieves a 3.51% return, which is significantly higher than GHY's 0.21% return. Over the past 10 years, JFR has underperformed GHY with an annualized return of 6.32%, while GHY has yielded a comparatively higher 7.21% annualized return.
JFR
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- YTD
- 3.51%
- 6M
- 3.91%
- 1Y
- 3.08%
- 3Y*
- 12.30%
- 5Y*
- 5.92%
- 10Y*
- 6.32%
GHY
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- -0.37%
- YTD
- 0.21%
- 6M
- 0.33%
- 1Y
- -1.24%
- 3Y*
- 13.55%
- 5Y*
- 4.94%
- 10Y*
- 7.21%
JFR vs. GHY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JFR Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fund | 3.51% | -0.68% | 21.92% | 16.61% | -15.15% | 24.66% | -8.05% | 19.65% | -11.69% | 2.94% |
GHY PGIM Global High Yield Fund | 0.21% | 10.46% | 20.25% | 17.29% | -20.04% | 12.73% | 6.33% | 26.51% | -3.54% | 4.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between JFR and GHY is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2012 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JFR vs. GHY — Risk / Return Rank
JFR
GHY
JFR vs. GHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fund (JFR) and PGIM Global High Yield Fund (GHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JFR | GHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 0.99 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.36 | -0.10 | +0.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.93 | -0.25 | +1.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JFR vs. GHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JFR drawdown since its inception was -62.61%, which is greater than GHY's maximum drawdown of -41.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JFR and GHY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JFR | GHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.61% | -41.35% | -21.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.62% | -11.94% | +3.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.29% | -16.36% | +1.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.40% | -29.50% | +9.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.71% | -41.35% | -6.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.52% | -4.99% | +4.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.77% | -6.02% | -2.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.32% | 4.90% | -1.58% |
Volatility
JFR vs. GHY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fund (JFR) is 1.62%, while PGIM Global High Yield Fund (GHY) has a volatility of 3.38%. This indicates that JFR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JFR | GHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.62% | 3.38% | -1.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.12% | 8.41% | -1.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.55% | 10.85% | -2.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.81% | 14.27% | -1.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.65% | 15.34% | +1.31% |
JFR vs. GHY - Expense Ratio Comparison
JFR has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than GHY's 0.03% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
JFR vs. GHY - Dividend Comparison
JFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.04%, more than GHY's 10.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHY PGIM Global High Yield Fund | 10.64% | 10.21% | 10.23% | 11.09% | 11.62% | 8.35% | 8.67% | 8.04% | 7.72% | 7.77% | 8.53% | 10.07% |
JFR Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fund | 13.04% | 13.03% | 11.43% | 11.51% | 9.61% | 6.66% | 7.19% | 7.19% | 7.95% | 7.23% | 6.38% | 7.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JFR and GHY have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GHY has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to JFR (1.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JFR dropped -62.61% vs GHY's -41.35%.
JFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.36 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JFR and GHY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer