PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JETS vs. WAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JETS vs. WAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) and U.S. Global Technology and Aerospace & Defense ETF (WAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


JETS

1D
0.65%
1M
14.93%
YTD
11.08%
6M
9.61%
1Y
42.95%
3Y*
15.86%
5Y*
4.58%
10Y*
4.71%

WAR

1D
-4.72%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JETS vs. WAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JETS and WAR is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026

0.28

JETS vs. WAR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JETS
WAR

Industrials

90.5%
39.8%

Consumer Cyclical

7.2%

-

Technology

2.3%
55.6%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-5.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

2.7%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Industrials

JETS
90.5%
WAR
39.8%

Consumer Cyclical

JETS
7.2%
WAR

-

Technology

JETS
2.3%
WAR
55.6%

Basic Materials

JETS

-

WAR

-

Communication Services

JETS

-

WAR
-5.0%

Consumer Defensive

JETS

-

WAR

-

Energy

JETS

-

WAR

-

Financial Services

JETS

-

WAR
2.7%

Healthcare

JETS

-

WAR

-

Real Estate

JETS

-

WAR

-

Utilities

JETS

-

WAR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JETS vs. WAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JETS
JETS Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
JETS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JETS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
JETS Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
JETS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
JETS Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

WAR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JETS vs. WAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) and U.S. Global Technology and Aerospace & Defense ETF (WAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JETSWARDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.55

JETS vs. WAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JETS vs. WAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JETS drawdown since its inception was -64.92%, which is greater than WAR's maximum drawdown of -13.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JETS and WAR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JETSWARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.92%

-13.13%

-51.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.46%

-10.38%

+2.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.12%

-5.48%

-19.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.46%

Volatility

JETS vs. WAR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JETSWARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.15%

52.90%

-19.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.54%

52.90%

-20.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.23%

52.90%

-18.67%

JETS vs. WAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JETS and WAR have an expense ratio of 0.60%.


Dividends

JETS vs. WAR - Dividend Comparison

JETS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, while WAR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JETS
U.S. Global Jets ETF
0.75%0.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.67%0.04%1.24%0.09%1.57%0.58%0.17%
WAR
U.S. Global Technology and Aerospace & Defense ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JETS and WAR have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JETS and WAR have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.

JETS has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.00% for WAR.

JETS is categorized as Industrials Equities, while WAR is Aerospace & Defense.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JETS and WAR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer