JETS vs. SPMO
JETS (U.S. Global Jets ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JETS is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the U.S. Global Jets Index, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, JETS returned 3.62%/yr vs 20.86%/yr for SPMO. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JETS charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
JETS vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JETS achieves a 5.20% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 28.15% return. Over the past 10 years, JETS has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 3.62%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.86% annualized return.
JETS
- 1D
- 1.93%
- 1M
- 13.01%
- YTD
- 5.20%
- 6M
- 5.27%
- 1Y
- 32.79%
- 3Y*
- 13.75%
- 5Y*
- 2.62%
- 10Y*
- 3.62%
SPMO
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- 4.23%
- YTD
- 28.15%
- 6M
- 28.70%
- 1Y
- 43.47%
- 3Y*
- 41.53%
- 5Y*
- 23.50%
- 10Y*
- 20.86%
JETS vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JETS U.S. Global Jets ETF | 5.20% | 11.64% | 33.21% | 11.42% | -19.01% | -5.13% | -28.93% | 14.38% | -14.30% | 18.66% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 28.15% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -0.92% | 27.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between JETS and SPMO is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015 | 0.40 |
JETS vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JETS
SPMO
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
JETS
SPMO
Consumer Cyclical
JETS
SPMO
Technology
JETS
SPMO
Basic Materials
JETS
-
SPMO
Communication Services
JETS
-
SPMO
Consumer Defensive
JETS
-
SPMO
Energy
JETS
-
SPMO
Financial Services
JETS
-
SPMO
Healthcare
JETS
-
SPMO
Real Estate
JETS
-
SPMO
Utilities
JETS
-
SPMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JETS vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
JETS
SPMO
JETS vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JETS | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.41 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 3.44 | -2.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.47 | 13.01 | -9.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JETS vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JETS drawdown since its inception was -64.92%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JETS and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JETS | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.92% | -30.95% | -33.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.13% | -12.70% | -11.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.21% | -20.13% | -15.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.84% | -22.74% | -20.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.92% | -30.95% | -33.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.35% | -1.68% | -10.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.16% | -4.60% | -20.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.47% | 3.35% | +6.12% |
Volatility
JETS vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) has a higher volatility of 13.04% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) at 10.29%. This indicates that JETS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JETS | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.04% | 10.29% | +2.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.44% | 16.73% | +8.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.42% | 19.48% | +13.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.49% | 19.65% | +12.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.26% | 20.48% | +13.78% |
JETS vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
JETS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
JETS vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
JETS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, more than SPMO's 0.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JETS U.S. Global Jets ETF | 0.79% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.67% | 0.04% | 1.24% | 0.09% | 1.57% | 0.58% | 0.17% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.67% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JETS and SPMO have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JETS has higher volatility (13.04%) compared to SPMO (10.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JETS dropped -64.92% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 20.86% vs 3.62% for JETS. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, SPMO has been the lower-risk option at 10.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 20.86% return vs 3.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for JETS.
JETS has the higher dividend yield at 0.79%, compared with 0.67% for SPMO.
JETS is categorized as Industrials Equities, while SPMO is Momentum. JETS tracks U.S. Global Jets Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: US Global and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for JETS and 0.13% for SPMO.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JETS and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer