JEPQ vs. LRGF
JEPQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF) and LRGF (iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JEPQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index, while LRGF is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Diversified Multi-Factor. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JEPQ returned 17.64%/yr vs 19.41%/yr for LRGF. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. JEPQ charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for LRGF.
Performance
JEPQ vs. LRGF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JEPQ achieves a 5.52% return, which is significantly lower than LRGF's 8.94% return.
JEPQ
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- -2.60%
- 6M
- 3.56%
- YTD
- 5.52%
- 1Y
- 17.19%
- 3Y*
- 17.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.50%
LRGF
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 1.20%
- 6M
- 8.82%
- YTD
- 8.94%
- 1Y
- 15.34%
- 3Y*
- 19.41%
- 5Y*
- 13.20%
- 10Y*
- 13.48%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.23%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $411.15M | $392.07M | $419.06M | |
| $11.35M | $13.93M | $11.55M |
JEPQ vs. LRGF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 5.52% | 15.18% | 24.85% | 36.28% | -11.16% |
LRGF iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF | 8.94% | 16.48% | 26.59% | 25.85% | -5.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between JEPQ and LRGF is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2022 | 0.91 |
The correlation between JEPQ and LRGF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
JEPQ vs. LRGF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JEPQ
LRGF
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Energy
Real Estate
Technology
JEPQ
LRGF
Communication Services
JEPQ
LRGF
Consumer Cyclical
JEPQ
LRGF
Consumer Defensive
JEPQ
LRGF
Healthcare
JEPQ
LRGF
Industrials
JEPQ
LRGF
Utilities
JEPQ
LRGF
Basic Materials
JEPQ
LRGF
Financial Services
JEPQ
LRGF
Energy
JEPQ
LRGF
Real Estate
JEPQ
LRGF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JEPQ vs. LRGF — Risk / Return Rank
JEPQ
LRGF
JEPQ vs. LRGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) and iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JEPQ | LRGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.22 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | 1.78 | +0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.72 | 6.95 | +1.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JEPQ vs. LRGF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JEPQ drawdown since its inception was -20.07%, smaller than the maximum LRGF drawdown of -36.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEPQ and LRGF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JEPQ | LRGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.07% | -36.03% | +15.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.82% | -8.92% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.07% | -19.44% | -0.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.71% | -2.11% | -2.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.37% | -4.51% | +1.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | 2.28% | -0.29% |
Volatility
JEPQ vs. LRGF - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) has a higher volatility of 5.63% compared to iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF) at 2.90%. This indicates that JEPQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LRGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JEPQ | LRGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.63% | 2.90% | +2.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.56% | 9.83% | +1.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.13% | 12.69% | +1.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.84% | 17.07% | -0.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.84% | 18.28% | -1.44% |
JEPQ vs. LRGF - Expense Ratio Comparison
JEPQ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than LRGF's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
JEPQ vs. LRGF - Dividend Comparison
JEPQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.80%, more than LRGF's 1.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 10.80% | 10.53% | 9.65% | 10.03% | 9.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LRGF iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF | 1.09% | 1.16% | 1.23% | 1.49% | 1.78% | 1.05% | 1.35% | 1.76% | 3.27% | 1.68% | 1.56% | 0.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, JEPQ and LRGF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
JEPQ has higher volatility (5.63%) compared to LRGF (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JEPQ dropped -20.07% vs LRGF's -36.03%.
On 3-year performance, LRGF leads with 19.41% vs 17.64% for JEPQ. On fees, LRGF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, LRGF has been the lower-risk option at 2.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, LRGF has performed better with a 19.41% return vs 17.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LRGF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for JEPQ.
JEPQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.80%, compared with 1.09% for LRGF.
JEPQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while LRGF is Large Cap Blend Equities. JEPQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Index, while LRGF tracks MSCI USA Diversified Multi-Factor. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for JEPQ and 0.20% for LRGF.
LRGF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JEPQ and LRGF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer