PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JEMB vs. JSI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JEMB vs. JSI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF (JEMB) and Janus Henderson Securitized Income ETF (JSI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JEMB achieves a 2.72% return, which is significantly higher than JSI's 1.14% return.


JEMB

1D
0.24%
1M
0.57%
YTD
2.72%
6M
3.66%
1Y
12.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JSI

1D
0.16%
1M
0.34%
YTD
1.14%
6M
1.63%
1Y
4.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JEMB vs. JSI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JEMB and JSI is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2024

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JEMB vs. JSI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JEMB
JEMB Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
JEMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JEMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
JEMB Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
JEMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
JEMB Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

JSI
JSI Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
JSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
JSI Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
JSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
JSI Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JEMB vs. JSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF (JEMB) and Janus Henderson Securitized Income ETF (JSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JEMBJSIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.41

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

2.82

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.47

9.18

+2.29

JEMB vs. JSI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JEMB Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the JSI Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JEMB and JSI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JEMBJSIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64

1.99

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.25

2.50

-1.25

Drawdowns

JEMB vs. JSI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JEMB drawdown since its inception was -5.37%, which is greater than JSI's maximum drawdown of -2.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEMB and JSI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JEMBJSIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.37%

-2.31%

-3.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.67%

-1.68%

-2.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-0.30%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.01%

-0.34%

-0.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.14%

0.52%

+0.62%

Volatility

JEMB vs. JSI - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF (JEMB) has a higher volatility of 2.38% compared to Janus Henderson Securitized Income ETF (JSI) at 0.67%. This indicates that JEMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JEMBJSIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.38%

0.67%

+1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.35%

1.53%

+4.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.98%

2.38%

+5.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.51%

2.88%

+5.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.51%

2.88%

+5.63%

JEMB vs. JSI - Expense Ratio Comparison

JEMB has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than JSI's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

JEMB vs. JSI - Dividend Comparison

JEMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.27%, more than JSI's 5.80% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
JEMB
Janus Henderson Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF
6.27%6.19%2.53%0.00%
JSI
Janus Henderson Securitized Income ETF
5.80%5.80%6.16%0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


JEMB and JSI have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JEMB has higher volatility (2.38%) compared to JSI (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JEMB dropped -5.37% vs JSI's -2.31%.

On 1-year performance, JEMB leads with 12.99% vs 4.73% for JSI. On fees, JSI is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, JSI has been the lower-risk option at 0.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JEMB has performed better with a 12.99% return vs 4.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JSI is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for JEMB.

JEMB has the higher dividend yield at 6.27%, compared with 5.80% for JSI.

JEMB is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while JSI is Short-Term Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for JEMB and 0.50% for JSI.

JSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JEMB and JSI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer