JEMB vs. EMTL

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

JEMB (Janus Henderson Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF) and EMTL (SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JEMB returned 8.29% vs 3.21% for EMTL. Their 0.48 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. JEMB charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for EMTL.

Performance

JEMB vs. EMTL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF (JEMB) and SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF (EMTL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JEMB achieves a 1.87% return, which is significantly higher than EMTL's 0.65% return.

JEMB

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: -1.41%
• 6M: 1.41%
• YTD: 1.87%
• 1Y: 8.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.78%

EMTL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.06%
• 6M: 0.05%
• YTD: 0.65%
• 1Y: 3.21%
• 3Y*: 6.49%
• 5Y*: 1.51%
• 10Y*: 3.00%
• ALL TIME*: 3.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EMTL SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF	$352.14K	$728.16K	$831.05K
JEMB Janus Henderson Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF	$131.88K	$404.80K	$2.67M

JEMB vs. EMTL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
JEMB Janus Henderson Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF	1.87%	14.63%	0.99%
EMTL SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF	0.65%	8.27%	0.50%

Correlation

The correlation between JEMB and EMTL is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2024	0.48

Return for Risk

JEMB vs. EMTL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JEMB

JEMB Risk / Return Rank: 49
JEMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
JEMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
JEMB Omega Ratio Rank: 45
JEMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
JEMB Martin Ratio Rank: 60

EMTL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JEMB vs. EMTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF (JEMB) and SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF (EMTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JEMB	EMTL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.10	1.55	-0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.60	2.25	-0.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.29	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.90	1.75	+0.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.34	6.17	+1.18

JEMB vs. EMTL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JEMB Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is comparable to the EMTL Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JEMB and EMTL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JEMB vs. EMTL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JEMB drawdown since its inception was -5.37%, smaller than the maximum EMTL drawdown of -22.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEMB and EMTL.

Drawdown Indicators

	JEMB	EMTL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.37%	-22.91%	+17.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.67%	-2.00%	-2.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-3.53%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.91%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-22.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.89%	-0.17%	-1.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.00%	-3.78%	+2.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.20%	0.57%	+0.63%

Volatility

JEMB vs. EMTL - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF (JEMB) has a higher volatility of 2.07% compared to SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF (EMTL) at 0.43%. This indicates that JEMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JEMB	EMTL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.07%	0.43%	+1.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.71%	1.72%	+4.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.04%	2.27%	+5.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.43%	4.86%	+3.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.43%	4.65%	+3.78%

JEMB vs. EMTL - Expense Ratio Comparison

JEMB has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than EMTL's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

JEMB vs. EMTL - Dividend Comparison

JEMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.94%, while EMTL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
EMTL SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF	4.53%	5.09%	5.34%	4.78%	4.19%	5.43%	3.28%	3.96%	3.35%	4.16%	8.87%
JEMB Janus Henderson Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF	6.38%	6.19%	2.53%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JEMB and EMTL in my portfolio?

JEMB and EMTL have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JEMB or EMTL?

JEMB has higher volatility (2.07%) compared to EMTL (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JEMB dropped -5.37% vs EMTL's -22.91%.

Which ETF is better, JEMB or EMTL?

On 1-year performance, JEMB leads with 8.29% vs 3.21% for EMTL. On fees, JEMB is cheaper at 0.52% per year. On volatility, EMTL has been the lower-risk option at 0.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JEMB or EMTL?

Over the 1-year period, JEMB has performed better with a 8.29% return vs 3.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JEMB or EMTL?

JEMB is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for EMTL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JEMB or EMTL?

JEMB has the higher dividend yield at 6.38%, compared with 4.53% for EMTL.

What is the main difference between JEMB and EMTL?

They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for JEMB and 0.65% for EMTL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.