JEMA vs. IBND
JEMA (JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and IBND (SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JEMA is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while IBND is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate x USD >$1B: Corporate Bond. JEMA is actively managed, while IBND is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JEMA returned 7.20%/yr vs -1.50%/yr for IBND. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JEMA charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for IBND.
Performance
JEMA vs. IBND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JEMA achieves a 31.42% return, which is significantly higher than IBND's -1.08% return.
JEMA
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- 9.00%
- YTD
- 31.42%
- 6M
- 33.11%
- 1Y
- 63.06%
- 3Y*
- 24.84%
- 5Y*
- 7.20%
- 10Y*
- —
IBND
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- YTD
- -1.08%
- 6M
- -0.51%
- 1Y
- 2.86%
- 3Y*
- 6.69%
- 5Y*
- -1.50%
- 10Y*
- 0.65%
JEMA vs. IBND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JEMA JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 31.42% | 34.89% | 5.68% | 9.82% | -24.98% | -4.78% |
IBND SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF | -1.08% | 16.17% | -2.81% | 10.38% | -19.44% | -5.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between JEMA and IBND is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2021 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JEMA vs. IBND — Risk / Return Rank
JEMA
IBND
JEMA vs. IBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JEMA) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF (IBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JEMA | IBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.14 | 0.36 | +2.78 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.92 | 0.58 | +3.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.07 | +0.50 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.84 | 0.42 | +4.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.80 | 1.16 | +18.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JEMA | IBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.14 | 0.36 | +2.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | -0.15 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.15 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
JEMA vs. IBND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JEMA drawdown since its inception was -39.50%, which is greater than IBND's maximum drawdown of -35.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEMA and IBND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JEMA | IBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.50% | -35.62% | -3.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.11% | -6.75% | -6.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.11% | -9.18% | -8.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.45% | -34.32% | -5.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.10% | -9.45% | +8.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.04% | -10.64% | -6.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.19% | 2.46% | +0.73% |
Volatility
JEMA vs. IBND - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JEMA) has a higher volatility of 8.36% compared to SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF (IBND) at 2.04%. This indicates that JEMA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JEMA | IBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.36% | 2.04% | +6.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.54% | 6.15% | +11.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.20% | 7.97% | +12.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.02% | 9.74% | +9.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.90% | 8.94% | +9.96% |
JEMA vs. IBND - Expense Ratio Comparison
JEMA has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than IBND's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
JEMA vs. IBND - Dividend Comparison
JEMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, less than IBND's 2.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBND SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF | 2.74% | 2.49% | 2.61% | 2.08% | 0.54% | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.67% | 0.71% | 0.34% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
JEMA JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 2.23% | 2.93% | 2.44% | 2.95% | 2.69% | 1.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JEMA and IBND have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JEMA has higher volatility (8.36%) compared to IBND (2.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JEMA dropped -39.50% vs IBND's -35.62%.
On 5-year performance, JEMA leads with 7.20% vs -1.50% for IBND. On fees, JEMA is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, IBND has been the lower-risk option at 2.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JEMA has performed better with a 7.20% return vs -1.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JEMA is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IBND.
IBND has the higher dividend yield at 2.74%, compared with 2.23% for JEMA.
JEMA is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while IBND is Corporate Bonds. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for JEMA and 0.50% for IBND.
JEMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JEMA and IBND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer