JEMA vs. EMDV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JEMA (JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and EMDV (ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. JEMA is actively managed, while EMDV is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JEMA returned 7.20%/yr vs -3.15%/yr for EMDV. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JEMA charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for EMDV.

Performance

JEMA vs. EMDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JEMA) and ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JEMA achieves a 31.42% return, which is significantly higher than EMDV's 1.17% return.

JEMA

• 1D: -1.10%
• 1M: 9.00%
• YTD: 31.42%
• 6M: 33.11%
• 1Y: 63.06%
• 3Y*: 24.84%
• 5Y*: 7.20%
• 10Y*: —

EMDV

• 1D: -1.57%
• 1M: 0.78%
• YTD: 1.17%
• 6M: 1.13%
• 1Y: 7.88%
• 3Y*: 2.77%
• 5Y*: -3.15%
• 10Y*: 2.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JEMA vs. EMDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
JEMA JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF	31.42%	34.89%	5.68%	9.82%	-24.98%	-4.78%
EMDV ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF	1.17%	11.90%	0.06%	-1.03%	-18.19%	-3.03%

Correlation

The correlation between JEMA and EMDV is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2021	0.82

The correlation between JEMA and EMDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

JEMA vs. EMDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JEMA	EMDV
Technology	41.1%	22.5%
Financial Services	21.2%	24.1%
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	6.2%
Industrials	7.4%	6.2%
Communication Services	7.0%	6.2%
Energy	4.0%	-
Basic Materials	3.5%	1.9%
Consumer Defensive	2.5%	16.4%
Healthcare	1.7%	8.2%
Utilities	1.4%	8.3%
Real Estate	0.6%	-

Return for Risk

JEMA vs. EMDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JEMA

JEMA Risk / Return Rank: 88
JEMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
JEMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
JEMA Omega Ratio Rank: 89
JEMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
JEMA Martin Ratio Rank: 89

EMDV

EMDV Risk / Return Rank: 22
EMDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
EMDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
EMDV Omega Ratio Rank: 20
EMDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
EMDV Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JEMA vs. EMDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JEMA) and ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JEMA	EMDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.14	0.71	+2.43
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.92	1.07	+2.85
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	1.13	+0.43
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.84	1.09	+3.74
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	19.80	3.33	+16.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JEMA vs. EMDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JEMA Sharpe Ratio is 3.14, which is higher than the EMDV Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JEMA and EMDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JEMA	EMDV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.14	0.71	+2.43
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38	-0.21	+0.59
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.15	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.22	+0.19

Drawdowns

JEMA vs. EMDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JEMA drawdown since its inception was -39.50%, roughly equal to the maximum EMDV drawdown of -39.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEMA and EMDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	JEMA	EMDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.50%	-39.20%	-0.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.11%	-7.24%	-5.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.11%	-20.71%	+2.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.45%	-34.97%	-4.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.10%	-14.80%	+13.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.04%	-13.55%	-3.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.19%	2.37%	+0.82%

Volatility

JEMA vs. EMDV - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JEMA) has a higher volatility of 8.36% compared to ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV) at 4.17%. This indicates that JEMA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JEMA	EMDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.36%	4.17%	+4.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.54%	9.21%	+8.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.20%	11.21%	+8.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.02%	15.42%	+3.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.90%	18.26%	+0.64%

JEMA vs. EMDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

JEMA has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than EMDV's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

JEMA vs. EMDV - Dividend Comparison

JEMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, less than EMDV's 2.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
EMDV ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF	2.41%	2.46%	2.79%	1.88%	3.68%	2.12%	3.12%	2.38%	1.27%	2.09%	2.87%
JEMA JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF	2.23%	2.93%	2.44%	2.95%	2.69%	1.54%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JEMA and EMDV in my portfolio?

JEMA and EMDV have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JEMA or EMDV?

JEMA has higher volatility (8.36%) compared to EMDV (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JEMA dropped -39.50% vs EMDV's -39.20%.

Which ETF is better, JEMA or EMDV?

On 5-year performance, JEMA leads with 7.20% vs -3.15% for EMDV. On fees, JEMA is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, EMDV has been the lower-risk option at 4.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JEMA or EMDV?

Over the 5-year period, JEMA has performed better with a 7.20% return vs -3.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JEMA or EMDV?

JEMA is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for EMDV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JEMA or EMDV?

EMDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.41%, compared with 2.23% for JEMA.

What is the main difference between JEMA and EMDV?

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for JEMA and 0.60% for EMDV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JEMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.