PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JELMX vs. FFANX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JELMX vs. FFANX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Managed Volatility Moderate Portfolio (JELMX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JELMX achieves a 5.14% return, which is significantly lower than FFANX's 7.09% return. Over the past 10 years, JELMX has underperformed FFANX with an annualized return of 4.02%, while FFANX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.77% annualized return.


JELMX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.09%
6M
4.84%
YTD
5.14%
1Y
11.25%
3Y*
9.23%
5Y*
3.57%
10Y*
4.02%

FFANX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.00%
6M
6.64%
YTD
7.09%
1Y
13.83%
3Y*
10.91%
5Y*
5.10%
10Y*
6.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JELMX vs. FFANX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JELMX
John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Managed Volatility Moderate Portfolio
5.14%9.26%8.15%10.70%-14.86%7.89%3.27%16.71%-3.99%5.84%
FFANX
Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund
7.09%13.16%7.40%11.52%-13.62%8.03%13.10%15.81%-4.06%11.25%

Correlation

The correlation between JELMX and FFANX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2007

0.92

The correlation between JELMX and FFANX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JELMX vs. FFANX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JELMX
JELMX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
JELMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JELMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
JELMX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
JELMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
JELMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

FFANX
FFANX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FFANX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFANX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFANX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FFANX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFANX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JELMX vs. FFANX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Managed Volatility Moderate Portfolio (JELMX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JELMXFFANXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.38

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

2.70

-0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.51

11.47

-1.96

JELMX vs. FFANX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JELMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the FFANX Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JELMX and FFANX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JELMX vs. FFANX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JELMX drawdown since its inception was -44.89%, which is greater than FFANX's maximum drawdown of -31.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JELMX and FFANX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JELMXFFANXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.89%

-31.69%

-13.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.55%

-5.20%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.14%

-7.55%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.32%

-18.52%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.32%

-18.52%

+0.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-0.46%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.58%

-3.79%

-7.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.27%

1.22%

+0.05%

Volatility

JELMX vs. FFANX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Managed Volatility Moderate Portfolio (JELMX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX) have volatilities of 3.00% and 3.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JELMXFFANXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.00%

3.11%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.13%

6.12%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.54%

7.13%

+0.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.69%

7.96%

-0.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.41%

7.71%

-0.30%

JELMX vs. FFANX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JELMX has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than FFANX's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

JELMX vs. FFANX - Dividend Comparison

JELMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.04%, more than FFANX's 3.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFANX
Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund
3.66%3.97%2.81%2.49%5.75%2.35%2.36%3.67%4.56%2.56%1.43%3.18%
JELMX
John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Managed Volatility Moderate Portfolio
5.04%5.30%2.83%9.63%6.29%2.77%7.50%5.78%9.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JELMX and FFANX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFANX has higher volatility (3.11%) compared to JELMX (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JELMX dropped -44.89% vs FFANX's -31.69%.

FFANX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JELMX and FFANX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer