PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JELBX vs. TPDAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JELBX vs. TPDAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Managed Volatility Balanced Portfolio (JELBX) and Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund (TPDAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JELBX achieves a 6.97% return, which is significantly lower than TPDAX's 10.96% return. Over the past 10 years, JELBX has underperformed TPDAX with an annualized return of 4.69%, while TPDAX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.18% annualized return.


JELBX

1D
0.26%
1M
3.09%
YTD
6.97%
6M
7.17%
1Y
17.37%
3Y*
11.19%
5Y*
4.88%
10Y*
4.69%

TPDAX

1D
0.48%
1M
-0.42%
YTD
10.96%
6M
11.99%
1Y
25.38%
3Y*
15.44%
5Y*
8.65%
10Y*
7.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JELBX vs. TPDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JELBX
John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Managed Volatility Balanced Portfolio
6.97%9.73%9.33%12.06%-15.06%9.76%1.76%17.91%-4.89%7.55%
TPDAX
Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund
10.96%23.97%5.29%7.71%-5.63%12.15%8.83%13.77%-7.24%4.14%

Correlation

The correlation between JELBX and TPDAX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2009

0.65

Over the past year, the correlation between JELBX and TPDAX has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JELBX vs. TPDAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JELBX
JELBX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
JELBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JELBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
JELBX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
JELBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
JELBX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

TPDAX
TPDAX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
TPDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
TPDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JELBX vs. TPDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Managed Volatility Balanced Portfolio (JELBX) and Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund (TPDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JELBXTPDAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.43

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.13

3.34

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.27

11.51

+1.76

JELBX vs. TPDAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JELBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the TPDAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JELBX and TPDAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JELBXTPDAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

2.28

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.85

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.73

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.60

-0.45

Drawdowns

JELBX vs. TPDAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JELBX drawdown since its inception was -50.73%, which is greater than TPDAX's maximum drawdown of -22.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JELBX and TPDAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JELBXTPDAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.73%

-22.29%

-28.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.38%

-7.58%

+1.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.82%

-7.58%

-2.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.54%

-17.58%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.81%

-22.29%

+3.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.53%

+3.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.13%

-4.92%

-8.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.42%

2.20%

-0.78%

Volatility

JELBX vs. TPDAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Managed Volatility Balanced Portfolio (JELBX) is 2.58%, while Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund (TPDAX) has a volatility of 2.91%. This indicates that JELBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TPDAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JELBXTPDAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.58%

2.91%

-0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.61%

9.47%

-2.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.20%

11.17%

-2.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.57%

10.18%

-1.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.55%

9.90%

-1.35%

JELBX vs. TPDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JELBX has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than TPDAX's 1.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

JELBX vs. TPDAX - Dividend Comparison

JELBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.34%, more than TPDAX's 0.72% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
JELBX
John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Managed Volatility Balanced Portfolio
6.34%6.78%2.98%10.88%6.00%2.55%7.95%6.43%10.30%0.00%0.00%
TPDAX
Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund
0.72%0.80%2.76%2.35%4.48%0.50%0.00%2.89%2.69%0.13%0.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


JELBX and TPDAX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TPDAX has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to JELBX (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JELBX dropped -50.73% vs TPDAX's -22.29%.

JELBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JELBX and TPDAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer