PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JELBX vs. STDAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JELBX vs. STDAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Managed Volatility Balanced Portfolio (JELBX) and SEI Asset Allocation Trust Defensive Strategy Allocation Fund (STDAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JELBX achieves a 6.42% return, which is significantly higher than STDAX's 1.30% return. Over the past 10 years, JELBX has outperformed STDAX with an annualized return of 4.63%, while STDAX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.40% annualized return.


JELBX

1D
-0.51%
1M
1.93%
YTD
6.42%
6M
6.61%
1Y
16.22%
3Y*
11.00%
5Y*
4.63%
10Y*
4.63%

STDAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.27%
YTD
1.30%
6M
1.61%
1Y
3.99%
3Y*
4.49%
5Y*
2.87%
10Y*
2.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JELBX vs. STDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JELBX
John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Managed Volatility Balanced Portfolio
6.42%9.73%9.33%12.06%-15.06%9.76%1.76%17.91%-4.89%7.55%
STDAX
SEI Asset Allocation Trust Defensive Strategy Allocation Fund
1.30%4.46%5.35%4.45%-1.58%1.56%-19.54%19.83%-3.32%9.70%

Correlation

The correlation between JELBX and STDAX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2004

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between JELBX and STDAX has dropped to 0.51 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JELBX vs. STDAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JELBX
JELBX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
JELBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JELBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
JELBX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
JELBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
JELBX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

STDAX
STDAX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
STDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
STDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
STDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
STDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JELBX vs. STDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Managed Volatility Balanced Portfolio (JELBX) and SEI Asset Allocation Trust Defensive Strategy Allocation Fund (STDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JELBXSTDAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

2.71

-1.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

11.21

-8.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.72

47.83

-35.11

JELBX vs. STDAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JELBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is lower than the STDAX Sharpe Ratio of 4.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JELBX and STDAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JELBXSTDAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

4.69

-2.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

1.47

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.36

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.00

+0.14

Drawdowns

JELBX vs. STDAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JELBX drawdown since its inception was -50.73%, smaller than the maximum STDAX drawdown of -76.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JELBX and STDAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JELBXSTDAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.73%

-76.81%

+26.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.38%

-0.36%

-6.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.82%

-1.68%

-8.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.54%

-2.91%

-15.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.81%

-26.89%

+8.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-8.71%

+8.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.13%

-31.76%

+18.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.42%

0.08%

+1.34%

Volatility

JELBX vs. STDAX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Managed Volatility Balanced Portfolio (JELBX) has a higher volatility of 2.61% compared to SEI Asset Allocation Trust Defensive Strategy Allocation Fund (STDAX) at 0.34%. This indicates that JELBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STDAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JELBXSTDAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.61%

0.34%

+2.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.48%

0.68%

+5.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.22%

0.86%

+7.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.57%

1.96%

+6.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.55%

6.64%

+1.91%

JELBX vs. STDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JELBX has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than STDAX's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

JELBX vs. STDAX - Dividend Comparison

JELBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.37%, more than STDAX's 4.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JELBX
John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Managed Volatility Balanced Portfolio
6.37%6.78%2.98%10.88%6.00%2.55%7.95%6.43%10.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%
STDAX
SEI Asset Allocation Trust Defensive Strategy Allocation Fund
4.56%4.49%4.97%4.77%3.54%0.87%1.71%5.19%8.53%6.92%10.19%3.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


JELBX and STDAX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JELBX has higher volatility (2.61%) compared to STDAX (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JELBX dropped -50.73% vs STDAX's -76.81%.

STDAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.69 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JELBX and STDAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer