PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JELBX vs. BDJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JELBX vs. BDJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Managed Volatility Balanced Portfolio (JELBX) and BlackRock Enhanced Equity Dividend Fund (BDJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JELBX achieves a 6.42% return, which is significantly higher than BDJ's 1.01% return. Over the past 10 years, JELBX has underperformed BDJ with an annualized return of 4.63%, while BDJ has yielded a comparatively higher 10.14% annualized return.


JELBX

1D
-0.51%
1M
1.93%
YTD
6.42%
6M
6.61%
1Y
16.22%
3Y*
11.00%
5Y*
4.63%
10Y*
4.63%

BDJ

1D
0.76%
1M
1.56%
YTD
1.01%
6M
6.65%
1Y
18.70%
3Y*
14.16%
5Y*
6.92%
10Y*
10.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JELBX vs. BDJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JELBX
John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Managed Volatility Balanced Portfolio
6.42%9.73%9.33%12.06%-15.06%9.76%1.76%17.91%-4.89%7.55%
BDJ
BlackRock Enhanced Equity Dividend Fund
1.01%26.12%16.87%-6.67%0.83%26.56%-7.58%37.43%-10.42%20.78%

Correlation

The correlation between JELBX and BDJ is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2005

0.61

The correlation between JELBX and BDJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JELBX vs. BDJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JELBX
JELBX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
JELBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JELBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
JELBX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
JELBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
JELBX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

BDJ
BDJ Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
BDJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDJ Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
BDJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDJ Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JELBX vs. BDJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Managed Volatility Balanced Portfolio (JELBX) and BlackRock Enhanced Equity Dividend Fund (BDJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JELBXBDJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.28

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

1.53

+1.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.72

5.63

+7.08

JELBX vs. BDJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JELBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is higher than the BDJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JELBX and BDJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JELBXBDJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

1.57

+0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.43

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.55

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.32

-0.17

Drawdowns

JELBX vs. BDJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JELBX drawdown since its inception was -50.73%, smaller than the maximum BDJ drawdown of -59.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JELBX and BDJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JELBXBDJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.73%

-59.46%

+8.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.38%

-12.28%

+5.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.82%

-15.70%

+5.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.54%

-21.39%

+2.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.81%

-48.14%

+29.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-2.56%

+2.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.13%

-8.96%

-4.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.42%

3.33%

-1.91%

Volatility

JELBX vs. BDJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Managed Volatility Balanced Portfolio (JELBX) is 2.61%, while BlackRock Enhanced Equity Dividend Fund (BDJ) has a volatility of 3.40%. This indicates that JELBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BDJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JELBXBDJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.61%

3.40%

-0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.48%

9.34%

-2.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.22%

11.94%

-3.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.57%

16.17%

-7.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.55%

18.41%

-9.86%

JELBX vs. BDJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

JELBX has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than BDJ's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

JELBX vs. BDJ - Dividend Comparison

JELBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.37%, less than BDJ's 9.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BDJ
BlackRock Enhanced Equity Dividend Fund
9.24%9.03%8.21%9.49%12.18%5.95%7.08%6.66%7.21%6.07%6.88%7.36%
JELBX
John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Managed Volatility Balanced Portfolio
6.37%6.78%2.98%10.88%6.00%2.55%7.95%6.43%10.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JELBX and BDJ have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BDJ has higher volatility (3.40%) compared to JELBX (2.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JELBX dropped -50.73% vs BDJ's -59.46%.

JELBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JELBX and BDJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer