JEDI.DE vs. ING

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

JEDI.DE (VanEck Space Innovators UCITS ETF) is Industrials Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Space Industry ESG, while ING (ING Groep N.V.) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, JEDI.DE returned 65.71%/yr vs 38.25%/yr for ING. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

JEDI.DE vs. ING - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck Space Innovators UCITS ETF (JEDI.DE) and ING Groep N.V. (ING). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

JEDI.DE is traded in EUR, while ING is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ING values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JEDI.DE achieves a 76.99% return, which is significantly higher than ING's 13.77% return.

JEDI.DE

• 1D: 1.31%
• 1M: 5.77%
• YTD: 76.99%
• 6M: 81.86%
• 1Y: 188.91%
• 3Y*: 65.71%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ING

• 1D: 1.87%
• 1M: 3.07%
• YTD: 13.77%
• 6M: 16.87%
• 1Y: 50.95%
• 3Y*: 38.25%
• 5Y*: 27.81%
• 10Y*: 16.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JEDI.DE vs. ING - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
JEDI.DE VanEck Space Innovators UCITS ETF	76.99%	72.15%	52.14%	8.55%	4.41%
ING ING Groep N.V.	13.77%	68.44%	19.66%	27.92%	18.30%

Correlation

The correlation between JEDI.DE and ING is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2022	0.22

Return for Risk

JEDI.DE vs. ING — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JEDI.DE

JEDI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 94
JEDI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
JEDI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
JEDI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 89
JEDI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
JEDI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 94

ING

ING Risk / Return Rank: 85
ING Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
ING Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
ING Omega Ratio Rank: 84
ING Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
ING Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JEDI.DE vs. ING - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Space Innovators UCITS ETF (JEDI.DE) and ING Groep N.V. (ING). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JEDI.DE	ING	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.59	2.07	+2.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.51	2.81	+1.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	1.35	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.56	2.90	+5.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	28.05	9.46	+18.58

JEDI.DE vs. ING - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JEDI.DE Sharpe Ratio is 4.59, which is higher than the ING Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JEDI.DE and ING, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JEDI.DE vs. ING - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JEDI.DE drawdown since its inception was -30.10%, smaller than the maximum ING drawdown of -91.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEDI.DE and ING.

Drawdown Indicators

	JEDI.DE	ING	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.10%	-91.83%	+61.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.53%	-17.65%	-5.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.10%	-20.76%	-9.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-40.44%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-72.21%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.81%	-3.03%	-10.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.11%	-53.41%	+46.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.20%	5.40%	+1.80%

Volatility

JEDI.DE vs. ING - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Space Innovators UCITS ETF (JEDI.DE) has a higher volatility of 18.13% compared to ING Groep N.V. (ING) at 7.71%. This indicates that JEDI.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ING based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JEDI.DE	ING	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.13%	7.71%	+10.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.16%	19.66%	+14.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.91%	24.74%	+19.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.37%	28.90%	+3.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.37%	33.59%	-1.22%

Dividends

JEDI.DE vs. ING - Dividend Comparison

JEDI.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ING's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ING ING Groep N.V.	4.92%	4.78%	7.65%	5.86%	7.16%	5.09%	0.00%	5.92%	2.63%	3.28%	4.24%	2.58%
JEDI.DE VanEck Space Innovators UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JEDI.DE and ING in my portfolio?

JEDI.DE and ING have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.