PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JDVI vs. IFLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JDVI vs. IFLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Disciplined Value International Select ETF (JDVI) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JDVI achieves a 9.97% return, which is significantly lower than IFLO's 18.83% return.


JDVI

1D
0.46%
1M
-0.87%
6M
6.59%
YTD
9.97%
1Y
24.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IFLO

1D
0.42%
1M
-0.45%
6M
15.93%
YTD
18.83%
1Y
31.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JDVI vs. IFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JDVI and IFLO is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.87

The correlation between JDVI and IFLO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

JDVI vs. IFLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JDVI
IFLO

Financial Services

14.7%
1.1%

Technology

9.9%
21.5%

Healthcare

7.9%
11.7%

Industrials

7.9%
18.1%

Consumer Defensive

6.3%
2.8%

Basic Materials

4.1%
11.3%

Communication Services

3.7%
6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

3.6%
13.8%

Energy

1.8%
12.1%

Real Estate

-

0.0%

Utilities

-

1.0%

Financial Services

JDVI
14.7%
IFLO
1.1%

Technology

JDVI
9.9%
IFLO
21.5%

Healthcare

JDVI
7.9%
IFLO
11.7%

Industrials

JDVI
7.9%
IFLO
18.1%

Consumer Defensive

JDVI
6.3%
IFLO
2.8%

Basic Materials

JDVI
4.1%
IFLO
11.3%

Communication Services

JDVI
3.7%
IFLO
6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

JDVI
3.6%
IFLO
13.8%

Energy

JDVI
1.8%
IFLO
12.1%

Real Estate

JDVI

-

IFLO
0.0%

Utilities

JDVI

-

IFLO
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JDVI vs. IFLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JDVI
JDVI Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
JDVI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JDVI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
JDVI Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
JDVI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
JDVI Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

IFLO
IFLO Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
IFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
IFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JDVI vs. IFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Disciplined Value International Select ETF (JDVI) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JDVIIFLODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.39

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

4.91

-2.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.29

16.57

-9.29

JDVI vs. IFLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JDVI Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is lower than the IFLO Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JDVI and IFLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JDVI vs. IFLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JDVI drawdown since its inception was -14.97%, which is greater than IFLO's maximum drawdown of -6.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JDVI and IFLO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JDVIIFLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.97%

-6.44%

-8.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.50%

-6.44%

-6.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.82%

-1.80%

-1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.78%

-1.29%

-1.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.42%

1.92%

+1.50%

Volatility

JDVI vs. IFLO - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Disciplined Value International Select ETF (JDVI) has a higher volatility of 4.04% compared to VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO) at 3.54%. This indicates that JDVI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JDVIIFLODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.04%

3.54%

+0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.99%

12.03%

+2.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.20%

14.68%

+2.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.56%

14.58%

+1.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.56%

14.58%

+1.98%

JDVI vs. IFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

JDVI has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than IFLO's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

JDVI vs. IFLO - Dividend Comparison

JDVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, more than IFLO's 1.57% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


JDVI and IFLO have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JDVI has higher volatility (4.04%) compared to IFLO (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JDVI dropped -14.97% vs IFLO's -6.44%.

On 1-year performance, IFLO leads with 31.49% vs 24.82% for JDVI. On fees, IFLO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, IFLO has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IFLO has performed better with a 31.49% return vs 24.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IFLO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for JDVI.

JDVI has the higher dividend yield at 2.21%, compared with 1.57% for IFLO.

They also come from different issuers: John Hancock and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for JDVI and 0.56% for IFLO.

IFLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JDVI and IFLO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer