JDMNX vs. FLQM

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

JDMNX (Janus Henderson Enterprise Fund Class N) and FLQM (Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF) are both funds - JDMNX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Janus Henderson, while FLQM is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity Index. JDMNX is actively managed, while FLQM is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JDMNX returned 7.16%/yr vs 6.90%/yr for FLQM. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JDMNX charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for FLQM.

Performance

JDMNX vs. FLQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Enterprise Fund Class N (JDMNX) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (FLQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JDMNX achieves a 6.29% return, which is significantly higher than FLQM's 1.19% return.

JDMNX

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 4.60%
• YTD: 6.29%
• 6M: 7.65%
• 1Y: 14.75%
• 3Y*: 12.95%
• 5Y*: 7.16%
• 10Y*: 12.74%

FLQM

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: 0.48%
• YTD: 1.19%
• 6M: 1.68%
• 1Y: 8.05%
• 3Y*: 11.25%
• 5Y*: 6.90%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JDMNX vs. FLQM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JDMNX Janus Henderson Enterprise Fund Class N	6.29%	7.77%	15.40%	18.15%	-15.92%	17.17%	20.55%	35.41%	-0.80%	15.95%
FLQM Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF	1.19%	5.16%	14.32%	17.47%	-12.95%	28.76%	15.50%	28.56%	-4.24%	10.32%

Correlation

The correlation between JDMNX and FLQM is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2017	0.83

The correlation between JDMNX and FLQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JDMNX vs. FLQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JDMNX

JDMNX Risk / Return Rank: 14
JDMNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
JDMNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
JDMNX Omega Ratio Rank: 13
JDMNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
JDMNX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

FLQM

FLQM Risk / Return Rank: 21
FLQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
FLQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
FLQM Omega Ratio Rank: 19
FLQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
FLQM Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JDMNX vs. FLQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Enterprise Fund Class N (JDMNX) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (FLQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JDMNX	FLQM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.07	0.66	+0.41
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.61	1.07	+0.54
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.12	+0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.30	1.06	+0.24
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.53	2.97	+1.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JDMNX vs. FLQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JDMNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is higher than the FLQM Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JDMNX and FLQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JDMNX	FLQM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.07	0.66	+0.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41	0.42	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.78	0.58	+0.20

Drawdowns

JDMNX vs. FLQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JDMNX drawdown since its inception was -38.24%, roughly equal to the maximum FLQM drawdown of -37.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JDMNX and FLQM.

Drawdown Indicators

	JDMNX	FLQM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.24%	-37.26%	-0.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.37%	-7.57%	-3.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.53%	-19.70%	+0.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.15%	-22.51%	-1.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.24%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.23%	-2.86%	+2.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.16%	-4.92%	+0.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.26%	2.70%	+0.56%

Volatility

JDMNX vs. FLQM - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Enterprise Fund Class N (JDMNX) has a higher volatility of 4.20% compared to Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (FLQM) at 2.91%. This indicates that JDMNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JDMNX	FLQM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.20%	2.91%	+1.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.55%	8.35%	+2.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.80%	12.18%	+1.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.67%	16.39%	+1.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.71%	18.48%	+0.23%

JDMNX vs. FLQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

JDMNX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than FLQM's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

JDMNX vs. FLQM - Dividend Comparison

JDMNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.02%, more than FLQM's 1.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLQM Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF	1.51%	1.49%	1.28%	1.27%	1.33%	1.05%	1.10%	1.37%	1.42%	1.15%	0.00%	0.00%
JDMNX Janus Henderson Enterprise Fund Class N	7.02%	7.46%	7.00%	7.40%	10.36%	15.92%	8.49%	4.52%	6.48%	1.76%	1.86%	3.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JDMNX and FLQM in my portfolio?

JDMNX and FLQM have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JDMNX or FLQM?

JDMNX has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to FLQM (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JDMNX dropped -38.24% vs FLQM's -37.26%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JDMNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.