JDMNX vs. BAFWX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

JDMNX (Janus Henderson Enterprise Fund Class N) and BAFWX (Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund Institutional Shares) are both mutual funds - JDMNX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Janus Henderson, while BAFWX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Brown Advisory Funds. Over the past 10 years, JDMNX returned 13.22%/yr vs 15.66%/yr for BAFWX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JDMNX charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for BAFWX.

Performance

JDMNX vs. BAFWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Enterprise Fund Class N (JDMNX) and Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund Institutional Shares (BAFWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JDMNX achieves a 7.19% return, which is significantly higher than BAFWX's 2.06% return. Over the past 10 years, JDMNX has underperformed BAFWX with an annualized return of 13.22%, while BAFWX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.66% annualized return.

JDMNX

• 1D: 0.71%
• 1M: 2.28%
• YTD: 7.19%
• 6M: 5.39%
• 1Y: 13.97%
• 3Y*: 12.97%
• 5Y*: 7.25%
• 10Y*: 13.22%

BAFWX

• 1D: -1.41%
• 1M: 1.21%
• YTD: 2.06%
• 6M: 0.84%
• 1Y: 4.44%
• 3Y*: 13.20%
• 5Y*: 7.37%
• 10Y*: 15.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JDMNX vs. BAFWX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JDMNX Janus Henderson Enterprise Fund Class N	7.19%	7.77%	15.40%	18.15%	-15.92%	17.17%	20.55%	35.41%	-0.80%	26.41%
BAFWX Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund Institutional Shares	2.06%	3.35%	20.35%	39.07%	-30.90%	30.01%	39.09%	36.09%	4.51%	28.10%

Correlation

The correlation between JDMNX and BAFWX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2012	0.86

The correlation between JDMNX and BAFWX shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

JDMNX vs. BAFWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JDMNX

JDMNX Risk / Return Rank: 17
JDMNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
JDMNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
JDMNX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
JDMNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
JDMNX Martin Ratio Rank: 19

BAFWX

BAFWX Risk / Return Rank: 5
BAFWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
BAFWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
BAFWX Omega Ratio Rank: 5
BAFWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
BAFWX Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JDMNX vs. BAFWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Enterprise Fund Class N (JDMNX) and Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund Institutional Shares (BAFWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JDMNX	BAFWX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.05	0.29	+0.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.57	0.51	+1.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.06	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.32	0.25	+1.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.57	0.65	+3.91

JDMNX vs. BAFWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JDMNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is higher than the BAFWX Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JDMNX and BAFWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JDMNX vs. BAFWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JDMNX drawdown since its inception was -38.24%, roughly equal to the maximum BAFWX drawdown of -36.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JDMNX and BAFWX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JDMNX	BAFWX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.24%	-36.86%	-1.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.37%	-19.93%	+8.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.53%	-25.03%	+5.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.15%	-36.86%	+12.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.24%	-36.86%	-1.38%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.59%	-4.84%	+4.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.15%	-5.70%	+1.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.27%	7.70%	-4.43%

Volatility

JDMNX vs. BAFWX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson Enterprise Fund Class N (JDMNX) is 4.84%, while Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund Institutional Shares (BAFWX) has a volatility of 7.20%. This indicates that JDMNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAFWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JDMNX	BAFWX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.84%	7.20%	-2.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.22%	14.13%	-2.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.25%	17.36%	-3.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.75%	22.73%	-4.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.75%	21.58%	-2.83%

JDMNX vs. BAFWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JDMNX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than BAFWX's 0.64% expense ratio.

Dividends

JDMNX vs. BAFWX - Dividend Comparison

JDMNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.96%, less than BAFWX's 23.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BAFWX Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund Institutional Shares	23.35%	23.83%	5.23%	0.01%	0.00%	1.82%	0.00%	1.48%	3.71%	1.70%	0.71%	4.73%
JDMNX Janus Henderson Enterprise Fund Class N	6.96%	7.46%	7.00%	7.40%	10.36%	15.92%	8.49%	4.52%	6.48%	1.76%	1.86%	3.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JDMNX and BAFWX in my portfolio?

JDMNX and BAFWX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JDMNX or BAFWX?

BAFWX has higher volatility (7.20%) compared to JDMNX (4.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JDMNX dropped -38.24% vs BAFWX's -36.86%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JDMNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.