JDJIX vs. TAUSX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JDJIX (JHancock Diversified Macro Fund) and TAUSX (John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - JDJIX is a Macro Trading fund managed by John Hancock, while TAUSX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund managed by John Hancock. Over the past 5 years, JDJIX returned 3.14%/yr vs -0.45%/yr for TAUSX. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. JDJIX charges 1.39%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for TAUSX.

Performance

JDJIX vs. TAUSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JHancock Diversified Macro Fund (JDJIX) and John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund (TAUSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JDJIX achieves a 11.06% return, which is significantly higher than TAUSX's 0.20% return.

JDJIX

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 1.99%
• YTD: 11.06%
• 6M: 10.34%
• 1Y: 8.28%
• 3Y*: 1.80%
• 5Y*: 3.14%
• 10Y*: —

TAUSX

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.55%
• YTD: 0.20%
• 6M: 0.12%
• 1Y: 5.49%
• 3Y*: 3.57%
• 5Y*: -0.45%
• 10Y*: 1.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JDJIX vs. TAUSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
JDJIX JHancock Diversified Macro Fund	11.06%	-7.68%	2.59%	2.77%	12.26%	-2.19%	-2.24%	1.59%
TAUSX John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund	0.20%	7.38%	0.94%	4.76%	-14.69%	-1.49%	9.52%	2.41%

Correlation

The correlation between JDJIX and TAUSX is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.10
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2019	-0.12

The correlation between JDJIX and TAUSX shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (5 years) to 0.09 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

JDJIX vs. TAUSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JDJIX

JDJIX Risk / Return Rank: 19
JDJIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
JDJIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
JDJIX Omega Ratio Rank: 21
JDJIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
JDJIX Martin Ratio Rank: 14

TAUSX

TAUSX Risk / Return Rank: 21
TAUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
TAUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
TAUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 21
TAUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
TAUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JDJIX vs. TAUSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JHancock Diversified Macro Fund (JDJIX) and John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund (TAUSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JDJIX	TAUSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.30	1.35	-0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.86	2.00	-0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.24	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.54	1.71	-0.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.09	5.10	-1.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JDJIX vs. TAUSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JDJIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the TAUSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JDJIX and TAUSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JDJIX	TAUSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.30	1.35	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36	-0.07	+0.43
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.31	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	1.02	-0.76

Drawdowns

JDJIX vs. TAUSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JDJIX drawdown since its inception was -19.58%, roughly equal to the maximum TAUSX drawdown of -19.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JDJIX and TAUSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JDJIX	TAUSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.58%	-19.90%	+0.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.72%	-3.23%	-2.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.58%	-7.29%	-12.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.58%	-19.90%	+0.32%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-19.90%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.54%	-4.40%	-5.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.39%	-2.37%	-5.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.15%	1.08%	+1.07%

Volatility

JDJIX vs. TAUSX - Volatility Comparison

JHancock Diversified Macro Fund (JDJIX) has a higher volatility of 1.84% compared to John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund (TAUSX) at 1.50%. This indicates that JDJIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TAUSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JDJIX	TAUSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.84%	1.50%	+0.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.21%	3.02%	+2.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.77%	4.09%	+2.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.87%	6.06%	+2.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.13%	5.00%	+4.13%

JDJIX vs. TAUSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JDJIX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is higher than TAUSX's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

JDJIX vs. TAUSX - Dividend Comparison

JDJIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than TAUSX's 4.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JDJIX JHancock Diversified Macro Fund	0.28%	0.31%	0.43%	3.99%	11.26%	3.46%	2.11%	3.79%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TAUSX John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund	4.05%	3.99%	3.40%	2.64%	2.50%	2.25%	4.49%	2.83%	2.83%	2.65%	2.66%	2.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JDJIX and TAUSX in my portfolio?

JDJIX and TAUSX have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JDJIX or TAUSX?

JDJIX has higher volatility (1.84%) compared to TAUSX (1.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JDJIX dropped -19.58% vs TAUSX's -19.90%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TAUSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.