PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JDIV vs. NZAC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

JDIV vs. NZAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Dividend Leaders ETF (JDIV) and SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

JDIV vs. NZAC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
JDIV
JPMorgan Dividend Leaders ETF
-1.43%18.98%-5.27%
NZAC
SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF
-5.23%20.55%-2.20%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JDIV achieves a -1.43% return, which is significantly higher than NZAC's -5.23% return.


JDIV

1D
2.66%
1M
-6.69%
YTD
-1.43%
6M
-0.78%
1Y
14.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NZAC

1D
3.15%
1M
-5.91%
YTD
-5.23%
6M
-2.63%
1Y
17.22%
3Y*
15.04%
5Y*
8.05%
10Y*
10.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


JDIV vs. NZAC - Expense Ratio Comparison

JDIV has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than NZAC's 0.12% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

JDIV vs. NZAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JDIV
JDIV Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
JDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
JDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
JDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
JDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

NZAC
NZAC Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
NZAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NZAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
NZAC Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
NZAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
NZAC Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JDIV vs. NZAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Dividend Leaders ETF (JDIV) and SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JDIVNZACDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.89

0.97

-0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.36

1.51

-0.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.22

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.31

1.59

-0.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.57

6.70

-1.13

JDIV vs. NZAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JDIV Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is comparable to the NZAC Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JDIV and NZAC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JDIVNZACDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

0.97

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.54

-0.03

Correlation

The correlation between JDIV and NZAC is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

JDIV vs. NZAC - Dividend Comparison

JDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, more than NZAC's 2.01% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JDIV
JPMorgan Dividend Leaders ETF
2.22%2.15%0.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NZAC
SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF
2.01%1.90%1.88%1.65%1.81%1.62%1.59%2.17%2.53%2.20%2.00%2.40%

Drawdowns

JDIV vs. NZAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JDIV drawdown since its inception was -13.34%, smaller than the maximum NZAC drawdown of -33.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JDIV and NZAC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


JDIVNZACDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.34%

-33.72%

+20.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.96%

-10.85%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.87%

-7.27%

+0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.02%

-5.39%

+3.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

2.57%

+0.02%

Volatility

JDIV vs. NZAC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Dividend Leaders ETF (JDIV) is 5.76%, while SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) has a volatility of 6.18%. This indicates that JDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NZAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


JDIVNZACDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.76%

6.18%

-0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.03%

10.07%

-1.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.81%

17.91%

-2.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.18%

16.73%

-2.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.18%

17.09%

-2.91%