JDG.L vs. RMS.PA
JDG.L (Judges Scientific plc) and RMS.PA (Hermès International Société en commandite par actions) are both stocks. JDG.L operates in Scientific & Technical Instruments (Technology), while RMS.PA operates in Luxury Goods (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, JDG.L returned 12.41%/yr vs 19.32%/yr for RMS.PA. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
JDG.L vs. RMS.PA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
JDG.L is traded in GBp, while RMS.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the RMS.PA values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with JDG.L having a -25.96% return and RMS.PA slightly higher at -25.26%. Over the past 10 years, JDG.L has underperformed RMS.PA with an annualized return of 12.41%, while RMS.PA has yielded a comparatively higher 19.32% annualized return.
JDG.L
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- -12.08%
- YTD
- -25.96%
- 6M
- -26.74%
- 1Y
- -45.93%
- 3Y*
- -24.66%
- 5Y*
- -6.35%
- 10Y*
- 12.41%
RMS.PA
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- -5.25%
- YTD
- -25.26%
- 6M
- -26.88%
- 1Y
- -29.92%
- 3Y*
- -5.10%
- 5Y*
- 7.54%
- 10Y*
- 19.32%
JDG.L vs. RMS.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JDG.L Judges Scientific plc | -25.96% | -31.55% | -6.46% | 9.03% | 1.35% | 32.80% | 14.03% | 138.53% | 16.74% | 52.38% |
RMS.PA Hermès International Société en commandite par actions | -25.26% | -2.71% | 16.81% | 31.02% | -0.41% | 65.00% | 40.45% | 30.63% | 11.02% | 20.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between JDG.L and RMS.PA is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 4, 2007 | 0.06 |
The correlation between JDG.L and RMS.PA shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (all time) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JDG.L vs. RMS.PA — Risk / Return Rank
JDG.L
RMS.PA
JDG.L vs. RMS.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Judges Scientific plc (JDG.L) and Hermès International Société en commandite par actions (RMS.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JDG.L | RMS.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 0.82 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.77 | -0.86 | +0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.18 | -1.62 | +0.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JDG.L | RMS.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.14 | -1.06 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.17 | 0.26 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | 0.75 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.00 | 0.67 | -0.67 |
Drawdowns
JDG.L vs. RMS.PA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JDG.L drawdown since its inception was -99.35%, which is greater than RMS.PA's maximum drawdown of -42.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JDG.L and RMS.PA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JDG.L | RMS.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.35% | -42.35% | -57.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.50% | -35.94% | -23.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.47% | -41.67% | -27.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.47% | -41.67% | -27.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.47% | -41.67% | -27.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.71% | -40.93% | -23.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.33% | -10.71% | -53.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.00% | 19.11% | +19.89% |
Volatility
JDG.L vs. RMS.PA - Volatility Comparison
Judges Scientific plc (JDG.L) has a higher volatility of 8.35% compared to Hermès International Société en commandite par actions (RMS.PA) at 7.82%. This indicates that JDG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RMS.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JDG.L | RMS.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.35% | 7.82% | +0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.18% | 22.96% | +6.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.15% | 29.20% | +10.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.86% | 28.84% | +9.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.56% | 25.34% | +10.22% |
Dividends
JDG.L vs. RMS.PA - Dividend Comparison
JDG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, more than RMS.PA's 1.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JDG.L Judges Scientific plc | 2.55% | 1.89% | 1.16% | 0.94% | 0.82% | 0.68% | 0.81% | 0.80% | 1.42% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RMS.PA Hermès International Société en commandite par actions | 1.14% | 1.23% | 1.08% | 0.68% | 0.55% | 0.30% | 0.52% | 0.68% | 1.34% | 0.84% | 0.86% | 0.95% |
Financials
JDG.L vs. RMS.PA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Judges Scientific plc and Hermès International Société en commandite par actions. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
JDG.L and RMS.PA have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for JDG.L and RMS.PA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer