PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RMS.PA vs. LVMUY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RMS.PA vs. LVMUY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Hermès International Société en commandite par actions (RMS.PA) and LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (LVMUY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

RMS.PA is traded in EUR, while LVMUY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LVMUY values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMS.PA achieves a -25.55% return, which is significantly higher than LVMUY's -27.20% return. Over the past 10 years, RMS.PA has outperformed LVMUY with an annualized return of 18.03%, while LVMUY has yielded a comparatively lower 14.65% annualized return.


RMS.PA

1D
-2.46%
1M
-1.54%
YTD
-25.55%
6M
-24.92%
1Y
-33.68%
3Y*
-6.22%
5Y*
7.15%
10Y*
18.03%

LVMUY

1D
-3.12%
1M
3.62%
YTD
-27.20%
6M
-26.09%
1Y
-0.64%
3Y*
-16.07%
5Y*
-4.90%
10Y*
14.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RMS.PA vs. LVMUY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RMS.PA
Hermès International Société en commandite par actions
-25.55%-7.65%22.38%33.69%-5.31%75.41%32.94%38.49%9.93%15.43%
LVMUY
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne
-27.20%4.10%-12.59%10.47%-5.32%44.16%25.68%65.97%6.38%39.90%

Correlation

The correlation between RMS.PA and LVMUY is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2007

0.49

The correlation between RMS.PA and LVMUY shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (all time) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RMS.PA vs. LVMUY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMS.PA
RMS.PA Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
RMS.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMS.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMS.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
RMS.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMS.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

LVMUY
LVMUY Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
LVMUY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVMUY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVMUY Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
LVMUY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVMUY Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RMS.PA vs. LVMUY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hermès International Société en commandite par actions (RMS.PA) and LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (LVMUY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RMS.PALVMUYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.80

1.02

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.92

-0.02

-0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.71

-0.04

-1.67

RMS.PA vs. LVMUY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMS.PA Sharpe Ratio is -1.14, which is lower than the LVMUY Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMS.PA and LVMUY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RMS.PALVMUYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.14

-0.02

-1.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

-0.16

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.50

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.28

+0.37

Drawdowns

RMS.PA vs. LVMUY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMS.PA drawdown since its inception was -47.65%, smaller than the maximum LVMUY drawdown of -77.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMS.PA and LVMUY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RMS.PALVMUYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.65%

-77.57%

+29.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.15%

-30.99%

-5.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.77%

-48.72%

+4.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.77%

-49.72%

+5.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.77%

-49.72%

+5.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.77%

-45.80%

+2.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.12%

-18.11%

+6.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.57%

15.26%

+4.31%

Volatility

RMS.PA vs. LVMUY - Volatility Comparison

Hermès International Société en commandite par actions (RMS.PA) and LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (LVMUY) have volatilities of 9.60% and 9.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RMS.PALVMUYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.60%

9.95%

-0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.97%

21.28%

+1.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.23%

30.75%

-1.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.76%

30.16%

-1.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.08%

29.38%

-4.30%

Dividends

RMS.PA vs. LVMUY - Dividend Comparison

RMS.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than LVMUY's 2.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LVMUY
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne
2.82%1.92%2.14%1.65%1.78%0.99%1.64%1.49%2.21%2.67%4.16%12.95%
RMS.PA
Hermès International Société en commandite par actions
1.15%1.23%1.08%0.68%0.55%0.30%0.52%0.68%1.34%0.84%0.86%0.95%

Financials

RMS.PA vs. LVMUY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hermès International Société en commandite par actions and LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. RMS.PA values in EUR, LVMUY values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


RMS.PA and LVMUY have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RMS.PA and LVMUY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer