PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
RMS.PA vs. MC.PA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


RMS.PAMC.PA
YTD Return17.50%6.56%
1Y Return14.63%-9.53%
3Y Return (Ann)29.29%8.87%
5Y Return (Ann)29.72%18.45%
10Y Return (Ann)24.92%21.54%
Sharpe Ratio0.53-0.37
Daily Std Dev24.41%27.29%
Max Drawdown-47.65%-70.25%
Current Drawdown-6.62%-11.96%

Fundamentals


RMS.PAMC.PA
Market Cap€246.12B€395.74B
EPS€41.13€30.34
PE Ratio57.1426.11
PEG Ratio5.372.58
Revenue (TTM)€13.43B€86.15B
Gross Profit (TTM)€8.21B€54.20B
EBITDA (TTM)€6.04B€25.27B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between RMS.PA and MC.PA is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

RMS.PA vs. MC.PA - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, RMS.PA achieves a 17.50% return, which is significantly higher than MC.PA's 6.56% return. Over the past 10 years, RMS.PA has outperformed MC.PA with an annualized return of 24.92%, while MC.PA has yielded a comparatively lower 21.54% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


10,000.00%20,000.00%30,000.00%40,000.00%50,000.00%60,000.00%December2024FebruaryMarchApril
52,254.74%
6,787.83%
RMS.PA
MC.PA

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Hermès International Société en commandite par actions

LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne

Risk-Adjusted Performance

RMS.PA vs. MC.PA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hermès International Société en commandite par actions (RMS.PA) and LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RMS.PA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RMS.PA, currently valued at 0.36, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.000.36
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for RMS.PA, currently valued at 0.69, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.69
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for RMS.PA, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.08
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for RMS.PA, currently valued at 0.43, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.43
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for RMS.PA, currently valued at 1.07, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.001.07
MC.PA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MC.PA, currently valued at -0.45, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00-0.45
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MC.PA, currently valued at -0.50, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.50
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MC.PA, currently valued at 0.94, compared to the broader market0.501.001.500.94
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MC.PA, currently valued at -0.42, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.42
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MC.PA, currently valued at -0.76, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.76

RMS.PA vs. MC.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMS.PA Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is higher than the MC.PA Sharpe Ratio of -0.37. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of RMS.PA and MC.PA.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.50December2024FebruaryMarchApril
0.36
-0.45
RMS.PA
MC.PA

Dividends

RMS.PA vs. MC.PA - Dividend Comparison

RMS.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than MC.PA's 1.68% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
RMS.PA
Hermès International Société en commandite par actions
0.16%0.68%0.55%0.30%0.52%0.68%0.85%0.84%0.86%0.95%0.92%0.95%
MC.PA
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne
1.68%1.70%1.76%0.96%0.90%1.50%2.09%1.71%1.98%2.28%3.58%2.26%

Drawdowns

RMS.PA vs. MC.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMS.PA drawdown since its inception was -47.65%, smaller than the maximum MC.PA drawdown of -70.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMS.PA and MC.PA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchApril
-8.57%
-16.11%
RMS.PA
MC.PA

Volatility

RMS.PA vs. MC.PA - Volatility Comparison

Hermès International Société en commandite par actions (RMS.PA) has a higher volatility of 7.34% compared to LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA) at 6.96%. This indicates that RMS.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MC.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%December2024FebruaryMarchApril
7.34%
6.96%
RMS.PA
MC.PA

Financials

RMS.PA vs. MC.PA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hermès International Société en commandite par actions and LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in EUR except per share items