RMS.PA vs. PRGS
RMS.PA (Hermès International Société en commandite par actions) and PRGS (Progress Software Corporation) are both stocks. RMS.PA operates in Luxury Goods (Consumer Cyclical), while PRGS operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 10 years, RMS.PA returned 18.03%/yr vs 2.81%/yr for PRGS. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RMS.PA vs. PRGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
RMS.PA is traded in EUR, while PRGS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PRGS values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RMS.PA having a -25.55% return and PRGS slightly higher at -24.71%. Over the past 10 years, RMS.PA has outperformed PRGS with an annualized return of 18.03%, while PRGS has yielded a comparatively lower 2.81% annualized return.
RMS.PA
- 1D
- -2.46%
- 1M
- -1.54%
- YTD
- -25.55%
- 6M
- -24.92%
- 1Y
- -33.68%
- 3Y*
- -6.22%
- 5Y*
- 7.15%
- 10Y*
- 18.03%
PRGS
- 1D
- -5.93%
- 1M
- 9.74%
- YTD
- -24.71%
- 6M
- -25.92%
- 1Y
- -50.30%
- 3Y*
- -20.68%
- 5Y*
- -5.37%
- 10Y*
- 2.81%
RMS.PA vs. PRGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMS.PA Hermès International Société en commandite par actions | -25.55% | -7.65% | 22.38% | 33.69% | -5.31% | 75.41% | 32.94% | 38.49% | 9.93% | 15.43% |
PRGS Progress Software Corporation | -24.71% | -41.89% | 29.16% | 5.67% | 12.62% | 16.56% | 1.52% | 21.64% | -11.44% | 18.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between RMS.PA and PRGS is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2007 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RMS.PA vs. PRGS — Risk / Return Rank
RMS.PA
PRGS
RMS.PA vs. PRGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hermès International Société en commandite par actions (RMS.PA) and Progress Software Corporation (PRGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RMS.PA | PRGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 0.81 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.92 | -0.82 | -0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.71 | -1.29 | -0.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RMS.PA | PRGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.14 | -1.03 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | -0.16 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | 0.08 | +0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.12 | +0.53 |
Drawdowns
RMS.PA vs. PRGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMS.PA drawdown since its inception was -47.65%, smaller than the maximum PRGS drawdown of -67.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMS.PA and PRGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMS.PA | PRGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.65% | -67.49% | +19.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.15% | -61.75% | +25.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.77% | -67.49% | +23.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.77% | -67.49% | +23.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.77% | -67.49% | +23.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.77% | -58.65% | +14.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.12% | -18.41% | +7.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.57% | 39.14% | -19.57% |
Volatility
RMS.PA vs. PRGS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hermès International Société en commandite par actions (RMS.PA) is 9.60%, while Progress Software Corporation (PRGS) has a volatility of 17.56%. This indicates that RMS.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RMS.PA | PRGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.60% | 17.56% | -7.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.97% | 41.93% | -18.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.23% | 49.11% | -19.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.76% | 33.61% | -4.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.08% | 33.62% | -8.54% |
Dividends
RMS.PA vs. PRGS - Dividend Comparison
RMS.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, while PRGS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRGS Progress Software Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.81% | 1.29% | 1.39% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.52% | 1.62% | 1.21% | 0.39% | 0.00% |
RMS.PA Hermès International Société en commandite par actions | 1.15% | 1.23% | 1.08% | 0.68% | 0.55% | 0.30% | 0.52% | 0.68% | 1.34% | 0.84% | 0.86% | 0.95% |
Financials
RMS.PA vs. PRGS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hermès International Société en commandite par actions and Progress Software Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
RMS.PA and PRGS have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for RMS.PA and PRGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer