RMS.PA vs. PRGS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Hermès International Société en commandite par actions (RMS.PA) and Progress Software Corporation (PRGS).

Performance

RMS.PA vs. PRGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Hermès International Société en commandite par actions (RMS.PA) and Progress Software Corporation (PRGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RMS.PA vs. PRGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RMS.PA Hermès International Société en commandite par actions	-24.00%	-7.65%	22.38%	33.69%	-5.31%	75.41%	32.94%	38.49%	9.93%	15.43%
PRGS Progress Software Corporation	-39.35%	-41.89%	29.16%	5.67%	12.62%	16.56%	1.52%	21.64%	-11.44%	18.80%

Different Trading Currencies

RMS.PA is traded in EUR, while PRGS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PRGS values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMS.PA achieves a -24.00% return, which is significantly higher than PRGS's -39.35% return. Over the past 10 years, RMS.PA has outperformed PRGS with an annualized return of 19.01%, while PRGS has yielded a comparatively lower 1.28% annualized return.

RMS.PA

• 1D: -0.80%
• 1M: -21.47%
• YTD: -24.00%
• 6M: -22.58%
• 1Y: -32.49%
• 3Y*: -3.87%
• 5Y*: 11.85%
• 10Y*: 19.01%

PRGS

• 1D: -10.06%
• 1M: -37.38%
• YTD: -39.35%
• 6M: -40.75%
• 1Y: -53.41%
• 3Y*: -24.72%
• 5Y*: -9.46%
• 10Y*: 1.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

RMS.PA vs. PRGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMS.PA

RMS.PA Risk / Return Rank: 6
RMS.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
RMS.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
RMS.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 6
RMS.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
RMS.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 5

PRGS

PRGS Risk / Return Rank: 6
PRGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
PRGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
PRGS Omega Ratio Rank: 4
PRGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
PRGS Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RMS.PA vs. PRGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hermès International Société en commandite par actions (RMS.PA) and Progress Software Corporation (PRGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RMS.PA	PRGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-1.18	-1.18	0.00
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.67	-1.88	+0.21
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.80	0.76	+0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.80	-0.88	+0.07
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.73	-1.70	-0.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RMS.PA vs. PRGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMS.PA Sharpe Ratio is -1.18, which is comparable to the PRGS Sharpe Ratio of -1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMS.PA and PRGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RMS.PA	PRGS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.18	-1.18	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42	-0.30	+0.72
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76	0.04	+0.72
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.66	0.07	+0.59

Correlation

The correlation between RMS.PA and PRGS is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

RMS.PA vs. PRGS - Dividend Comparison

RMS.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, while PRGS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RMS.PA Hermès International Société en commandite par actions	1.71%	1.23%	1.08%	0.68%	0.55%	0.30%	0.52%	0.68%	1.34%	0.84%	0.86%	0.95%
PRGS Progress Software Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.81%	1.29%	1.39%	1.45%	1.48%	1.52%	1.62%	1.21%	0.39%	0.00%

Drawdowns

RMS.PA vs. PRGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMS.PA drawdown since its inception was -47.65%, smaller than the maximum PRGS drawdown of -66.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMS.PA and PRGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	RMS.PA	PRGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.65%	-67.33%	+19.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.88%	-60.33%	+22.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.60%	-63.30%	+20.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.60%	-63.30%	+20.70%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-42.60%	-63.30%	+20.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.89%	-23.37%	+12.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.61%	30.14%	-12.53%

Volatility

RMS.PA vs. PRGS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hermès International Société en commandite par actions (RMS.PA) is 9.26%, while Progress Software Corporation (PRGS) has a volatility of 17.20%. This indicates that RMS.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RMS.PA	PRGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.26%	17.20%	-7.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.98%	36.51%	-16.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.34%	45.55%	-18.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.94%	31.92%	-3.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.64%	32.78%	-8.14%

Financials