PortfoliosLab logo
RMS.PA vs. PRGS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between RMS.PA and PRGS is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

RMS.PA vs. PRGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hermès International Société en commandite par actions (RMS.PA) and Progress Software Corporation (PRGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RMS.PA:

0.42

PRGS:

0.70

Sortino Ratio

RMS.PA:

0.82

PRGS:

1.37

Omega Ratio

RMS.PA:

1.11

PRGS:

1.17

Calmar Ratio

RMS.PA:

0.50

PRGS:

0.84

Martin Ratio

RMS.PA:

1.24

PRGS:

2.02

Ulcer Index

RMS.PA:

9.84%

PRGS:

11.02%

Daily Std Dev

RMS.PA:

27.49%

PRGS:

32.42%

Max Drawdown

RMS.PA:

-47.65%

PRGS:

-67.33%

Current Drawdown

RMS.PA:

-9.63%

PRGS:

-11.22%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RMS.PA:

€266.17B

PRGS:

$2.67B

EPS

RMS.PA:

€43.77

PRGS:

$1.27

PE Ratio

RMS.PA:

58.01

PRGS:

48.86

PEG Ratio

RMS.PA:

5.46

PRGS:

2.42

PS Ratio

RMS.PA:

17.55

PRGS:

3.31

PB Ratio

RMS.PA:

14.84

PRGS:

6.07

Total Revenue (TTM)

RMS.PA:

€15.17B

PRGS:

$806.74M

Gross Profit (TTM)

RMS.PA:

€10.66B

PRGS:

$646.52M

EBITDA (TTM)

RMS.PA:

€6.93B

PRGS:

$239.96M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMS.PA achieves a 10.49% return, which is significantly higher than PRGS's -4.76% return. Over the past 10 years, RMS.PA has outperformed PRGS with an annualized return of 23.09%, while PRGS has yielded a comparatively lower 10.19% annualized return.


RMS.PA

YTD

10.49%

1M

12.05%

6M

25.22%

1Y

11.75%

5Y*

30.84%

10Y*

23.09%

PRGS

YTD

-4.76%

1M

7.54%

6M

-9.12%

1Y

22.58%

5Y*

13.63%

10Y*

10.19%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

RMS.PA vs. PRGS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMS.PA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RMS.PA is 6565
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RMS.PA is 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RMS.PA is 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RMS.PA is 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RMS.PA is 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RMS.PA is 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

PRGS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PRGS is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PRGS is 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PRGS is 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PRGS is 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PRGS is 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PRGS is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RMS.PA vs. PRGS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hermès International Société en commandite par actions (RMS.PA) and Progress Software Corporation (PRGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current RMS.PA Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the PRGS Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMS.PA and PRGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

RMS.PA vs. PRGS - Dividend Comparison

RMS.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, more than PRGS's 0.56% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
RMS.PA
Hermès International Société en commandite par actions
1.02%1.08%0.68%0.55%0.30%0.52%0.68%1.34%0.84%0.86%2.09%0.92%
PRGS
Progress Software Corporation
0.56%0.81%1.29%1.39%1.45%1.48%1.52%1.62%1.21%0.39%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

RMS.PA vs. PRGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMS.PA drawdown since its inception was -47.65%, smaller than the maximum PRGS drawdown of -67.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMS.PA and PRGS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

RMS.PA vs. PRGS - Volatility Comparison

Hermès International Société en commandite par actions (RMS.PA) has a higher volatility of 7.27% compared to Progress Software Corporation (PRGS) at 6.47%. This indicates that RMS.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

RMS.PA vs. PRGS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hermès International Société en commandite par actions and Progress Software Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20212022202320242025
7.67B
238.02M
(RMS.PA) Total Revenue
(PRGS) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. RMS.PA values in EUR, PRGS values in USD