PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JDBAX vs. JNRFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JDBAX vs. JNRFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Balanced Fund Class A (JDBAX) and Janus Henderson Research Fund (JNRFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JDBAX achieves a 3.84% return, which is significantly lower than JNRFX's 9.24% return. Over the past 10 years, JDBAX has underperformed JNRFX with an annualized return of 10.95%, while JNRFX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.74% annualized return.


JDBAX

1D
0.00%
1M
3.13%
YTD
3.84%
6M
3.83%
1Y
14.97%
3Y*
15.57%
5Y*
8.84%
10Y*
10.95%

JNRFX

1D
-0.23%
1M
7.60%
YTD
9.24%
6M
8.78%
1Y
25.42%
3Y*
26.35%
5Y*
14.89%
10Y*
16.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JDBAX vs. JNRFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JDBAX
Janus Henderson Balanced Fund Class A
3.84%14.78%20.54%15.17%-16.75%16.99%14.14%25.01%0.39%18.23%
JNRFX
Janus Henderson Research Fund
9.24%18.45%35.13%43.14%-29.96%20.19%32.82%35.40%-2.73%25.90%

Correlation

The correlation between JDBAX and JNRFX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2005

0.93

The correlation between JDBAX and JNRFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JDBAX vs. JNRFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JDBAX
JDBAX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
JDBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JDBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
JDBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
JDBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
JDBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

JNRFX
JNRFX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
JNRFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNRFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNRFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
JNRFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNRFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JDBAX vs. JNRFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Balanced Fund Class A (JDBAX) and Janus Henderson Research Fund (JNRFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JDBAXJNRFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.29

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

1.55

+0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.15

5.35

+2.80

JDBAX vs. JNRFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JDBAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the JNRFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JDBAX and JNRFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JDBAXJNRFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

1.67

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.68

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

0.79

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.47

+0.20

Drawdowns

JDBAX vs. JNRFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JDBAX drawdown since its inception was -34.14%, smaller than the maximum JNRFX drawdown of -74.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JDBAX and JNRFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JDBAXJNRFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.14%

-74.74%

+40.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.16%

-17.05%

+8.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.96%

-22.66%

+10.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.63%

-36.48%

+14.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.48%

-36.48%

+14.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.23%

+0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.38%

-24.96%

+19.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

4.94%

-3.05%

Volatility

JDBAX vs. JNRFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson Balanced Fund Class A (JDBAX) is 2.46%, while Janus Henderson Research Fund (JNRFX) has a volatility of 3.76%. This indicates that JDBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JNRFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JDBAXJNRFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.46%

3.76%

-1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.94%

12.32%

-5.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.71%

15.87%

-7.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.34%

22.03%

-10.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.27%

21.33%

-10.06%

JDBAX vs. JNRFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JDBAX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than JNRFX's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

JDBAX vs. JNRFX - Dividend Comparison

JDBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.34%, less than JNRFX's 10.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JDBAX
Janus Henderson Balanced Fund Class A
8.34%8.62%11.67%2.08%1.76%4.34%2.35%4.62%6.84%5.05%2.43%5.68%
JNRFX
Janus Henderson Research Fund
10.93%11.94%5.11%2.93%0.43%13.01%2.98%10.37%11.06%8.22%5.41%9.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, JDBAX and JNRFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JNRFX has higher volatility (3.76%) compared to JDBAX (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JDBAX dropped -34.14% vs JNRFX's -74.74%.

JDBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JDBAX and JNRFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer