PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JD vs. AMDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JD vs. AMDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JD.com, Inc. (JD) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JD achieves a 17.42% return, which is significantly lower than AMDL's 234.66% return.


JD

1D
-1.30%
1M
21.51%
6M
22.32%
YTD
17.42%
1Y
7.53%
3Y*
-2.99%
5Y*
-11.80%
10Y*
5.45%
ALL TIME*
4.48%

AMDL

1D
-16.90%
1M
-29.48%
6M
311.38%
YTD
234.66%
1Y
314.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
34.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$243.26M$222.94M$321.64M
$251.44M$231.70M$273.15M

JD vs. AMDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
JD
JD.com, Inc.
17.42%-14.78%29.92%
AMDL
GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF
234.66%103.00%-69.97%

Correlation

The correlation between JD and AMDL is 0.15, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2024

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JD vs. AMDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JD
JD Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
JD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
JD Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
JD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
JD Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

AMDL
AMDL Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
AMDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDL Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDL Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JD vs. AMDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JD.com, Inc. (JD) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JDAMDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.35

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.25

5.65

-5.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.46

10.58

-10.12

JD vs. AMDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JD Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is lower than the AMDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JD and AMDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JD vs. AMDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JD drawdown since its inception was -79.12%, smaller than the maximum AMDL drawdown of -88.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JD and AMDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JDAMDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.12%

-88.63%

+9.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.78%

-56.13%

+26.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.25%

-37.11%

-28.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.99%

-46.43%

+8.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.43%

29.94%

-13.51%

Volatility

JD vs. AMDL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JD.com, Inc. (JD) is 6.77%, while GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) has a volatility of 50.68%. This indicates that JD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JDAMDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.77%

50.68%

-43.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.10%

114.03%

-90.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.90%

144.28%

-112.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.36%

121.72%

-68.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.72%

121.72%

-74.00%

Dividends

JD vs. AMDL - Dividend Comparison

JD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, while AMDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
AMDL
GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JD
JD.com, Inc.
3.07%3.48%2.19%2.15%2.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


JD and AMDL have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMDL has higher volatility (50.68%) compared to JD (6.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JD dropped -79.12% vs AMDL's -88.63%.

AMDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JD and AMDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer