JCPI vs. SCHV
JCPI (JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF) and SCHV (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JCPI is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while SCHV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index. JCPI is actively managed, while SCHV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JCPI returned 5.20%/yr vs 18.05%/yr for SCHV. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JCPI charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHV.
Performance
JCPI vs. SCHV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JCPI achieves a 1.12% return, which is significantly lower than SCHV's 14.24% return.
JCPI
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -0.88%
- YTD
- 1.12%
- 6M
- 1.07%
- 1Y
- 5.14%
- 3Y*
- 5.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHV
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 3.06%
- YTD
- 14.24%
- 6M
- 15.31%
- 1Y
- 26.78%
- 3Y*
- 18.05%
- 5Y*
- 10.33%
- 10Y*
- 11.38%
JCPI vs. SCHV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JCPI JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF | 1.12% | 7.10% | 4.70% | 5.04% | -5.53% |
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 14.24% | 16.02% | 14.13% | 8.93% | -5.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between JCPI and SCHV is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2022 | 0.25 |
JCPI vs. SCHV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JCPI
SCHV
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Financial Services
Technology
Real Estate
Healthcare
Utilities
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
JCPI
SCHV
Communication Services
JCPI
SCHV
Financial Services
JCPI
SCHV
Technology
JCPI
SCHV
Real Estate
JCPI
SCHV
Healthcare
JCPI
SCHV
Utilities
JCPI
SCHV
Energy
JCPI
SCHV
Consumer Cyclical
JCPI
SCHV
Industrials
JCPI
SCHV
Consumer Defensive
JCPI
SCHV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JCPI vs. SCHV — Risk / Return Rank
JCPI
SCHV
JCPI vs. SCHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF (JCPI) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JCPI | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.44 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.22 | 3.94 | -0.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.00 | 15.87 | -4.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JCPI | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.77 | 2.50 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.71 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
JCPI vs. SCHV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JCPI drawdown since its inception was -7.85%, smaller than the maximum SCHV drawdown of -37.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JCPI and SCHV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JCPI | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.85% | -37.08% | +29.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.60% | -6.83% | +5.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.81% | -15.26% | +12.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.96% | -1.49% | +0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.86% | -3.83% | +1.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.47% | 1.69% | -1.22% |
Volatility
JCPI vs. SCHV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF (JCPI) is 0.95%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) has a volatility of 3.33%. This indicates that JCPI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JCPI | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.95% | 3.33% | -2.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.08% | 8.37% | -6.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.92% | 10.80% | -7.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.50% | 14.53% | -10.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.50% | 16.95% | -12.45% |
JCPI vs. SCHV - Expense Ratio Comparison
JCPI has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
JCPI vs. SCHV - Dividend Comparison
JCPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%, more than SCHV's 1.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JCPI JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF | 3.96% | 3.93% | 3.98% | 3.45% | 3.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.25% | 2.42% | 2.37% | 1.93% | 3.03% | 3.02% | 3.05% | 2.37% | 2.65% | 2.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JCPI and SCHV have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHV has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to JCPI (0.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JCPI dropped -7.85% vs SCHV's -37.08%.
On 3-year performance, SCHV leads with 18.05% vs 5.20% for JCPI. On fees, SCHV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, JCPI has been the lower-risk option at 0.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SCHV has performed better with a 18.05% return vs 5.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for JCPI.
JCPI has the higher dividend yield at 3.96%, compared with 1.78% for SCHV.
JCPI is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while SCHV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for JCPI and 0.04% for SCHV.
SCHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JCPI and SCHV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer