JCHI vs. RBIL

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

JCHI (JPMorgan Active China ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JCHI is a China Equities fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. JCHI is actively managed, while RBIL is passively managed. Over the past year, JCHI returned 14.68% vs 3.95% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.16, they often move in opposite directions. JCHI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.

Performance

JCHI vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Active China ETF (JCHI) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JCHI achieves a -1.62% return, which is significantly lower than RBIL's 2.31% return.

JCHI

• 1D: 0.97%
• 1M: -1.45%
• YTD: -1.62%
• 6M: -2.62%
• 1Y: 14.68%
• 3Y*: 8.68%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RBIL

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: -0.20%
• YTD: 2.31%
• 6M: 2.35%
• 1Y: 3.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JCHI vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
JCHI JPMorgan Active China ETF	-1.62%	16.13%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	2.31%	2.85%

Correlation

The correlation between JCHI and RBIL is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025	-0.16

Return for Risk

JCHI vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JCHI

JCHI Risk / Return Rank: 23
JCHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
JCHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
JCHI Omega Ratio Rank: 23
JCHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
JCHI Martin Ratio Rank: 20

RBIL

RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 97
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JCHI vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Active China ETF (JCHI) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JCHI	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.82	4.18	-3.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.24	6.39	-5.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	2.06	-0.91
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.03	7.59	-6.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.35	44.07	-41.73

JCHI vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JCHI Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is lower than the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 4.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JCHI and RBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JCHI vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JCHI drawdown since its inception was -29.57%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JCHI and RBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	JCHI	RBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.57%	-0.52%	-29.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.37%	-0.52%	-13.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.47%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.36%	-0.51%	-8.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.27%	-0.07%	-13.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.27%	0.09%	+6.18%

Volatility

JCHI vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Active China ETF (JCHI) has a higher volatility of 5.77% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.36%. This indicates that JCHI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JCHI	RBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.77%	0.36%	+5.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.90%	0.85%	+12.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.94%	0.95%	+16.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.79%	1.07%	+23.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.79%	1.07%	+23.72%

JCHI vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

JCHI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

JCHI vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

JCHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, less than RBIL's 4.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
JCHI JPMorgan Active China ETF	1.84%	1.81%	2.12%	2.13%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	4.38%	3.65%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JCHI and RBIL in my portfolio?

JCHI and RBIL have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JCHI or RBIL?

JCHI has higher volatility (5.77%) compared to RBIL (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JCHI dropped -29.57% vs RBIL's -0.52%.

Which ETF is better, JCHI or RBIL?

On 1-year performance, JCHI leads with 14.68% vs 3.95% for RBIL. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JCHI or RBIL?

Over the 1-year period, JCHI has performed better with a 14.68% return vs 3.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JCHI or RBIL?

RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for JCHI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JCHI or RBIL?

RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.38%, compared with 1.84% for JCHI.

What is the main difference between JCHI and RBIL?

JCHI is categorized as China Equities, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for JCHI and 0.17% for RBIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.18 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.