JCHI vs. MCH

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

JCHI (JPMorgan Active China ETF) and MCH (Matthews China Active ETF) are both China Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, JCHI returned 7.77%/yr vs 13.78%/yr for MCH. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. JCHI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for MCH.

Performance

JCHI vs. MCH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Active China ETF (JCHI) and Matthews China Active ETF (MCH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JCHI achieves a -4.08% return, which is significantly lower than MCH's 3.54% return.

JCHI

• 1D: -2.49%
• 1M: -3.91%
• YTD: -4.08%
• 6M: -4.86%
• 1Y: 11.15%
• 3Y*: 7.77%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MCH

• 1D: -2.85%
• 1M: 0.40%
• YTD: 3.54%
• 6M: 2.21%
• 1Y: 23.79%
• 3Y*: 13.78%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JCHI vs. MCH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
JCHI JPMorgan Active China ETF	-4.08%	27.66%	13.77%	-17.31%
MCH Matthews China Active ETF	3.54%	30.20%	17.32%	-15.14%

Correlation

The correlation between JCHI and MCH is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2023	0.95

The correlation between JCHI and MCH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JCHI vs. MCH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JCHI

JCHI Risk / Return Rank: 18
JCHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
JCHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
JCHI Omega Ratio Rank: 18
JCHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
JCHI Martin Ratio Rank: 17

MCH

MCH Risk / Return Rank: 33
MCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
MCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
MCH Omega Ratio Rank: 32
MCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
MCH Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JCHI vs. MCH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Active China ETF (JCHI) and Matthews China Active ETF (MCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JCHI	MCH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.62	1.14	-0.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.97	1.68	-0.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.21	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.78	1.59	-0.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.77	4.20	-2.43

JCHI vs. MCH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JCHI Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is lower than the MCH Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JCHI and MCH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JCHI vs. MCH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JCHI drawdown since its inception was -29.57%, smaller than the maximum MCH drawdown of -40.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JCHI and MCH.

Drawdown Indicators

	JCHI	MCH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.57%	-40.53%	+10.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.37%	-15.05%	+0.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.47%	-30.57%	+3.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.62%	-3.82%	-7.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.27%	-18.31%	+5.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.32%	5.68%	+0.64%

Volatility

JCHI vs. MCH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Active China ETF (JCHI) is 6.24%, while Matthews China Active ETF (MCH) has a volatility of 8.12%. This indicates that JCHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MCH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JCHI	MCH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.24%	8.12%	-1.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.14%	15.66%	-2.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.09%	20.89%	-2.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.82%	29.51%	-4.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.82%	29.51%	-4.69%

JCHI vs. MCH - Expense Ratio Comparison

JCHI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than MCH's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

JCHI vs. MCH - Dividend Comparison

JCHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, more than MCH's 1.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
JCHI JPMorgan Active China ETF	1.89%	1.81%	2.12%	2.13%
MCH Matthews China Active ETF	1.70%	1.76%	1.31%	1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JCHI and MCH in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, JCHI and MCH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, JCHI or MCH?

MCH has higher volatility (8.12%) compared to JCHI (6.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JCHI dropped -29.57% vs MCH's -40.53%.

Which ETF is better, JCHI or MCH?

On 3-year performance, MCH leads with 13.78% vs 7.77% for JCHI. On fees, JCHI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, JCHI has been the lower-risk option at 6.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JCHI or MCH?

Over the 3-year period, MCH has performed better with a 13.78% return vs 7.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JCHI or MCH?

JCHI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for MCH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JCHI or MCH?

JCHI has the higher dividend yield at 1.89%, compared with 1.70% for MCH.

What is the main difference between JCHI and MCH?

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Matthews. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for JCHI and 0.79% for MCH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MCH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.