PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JCHI vs. ECNS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

JCHI vs. ECNS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Active China ETF (JCHI) and iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

JCHI vs. ECNS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
JCHI
JPMorgan Active China ETF
-4.46%27.66%13.77%-17.06%
ECNS
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF
1.03%36.49%5.64%-21.39%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JCHI achieves a -4.46% return, which is significantly lower than ECNS's 1.03% return.


JCHI

1D
0.61%
1M
-4.41%
YTD
-4.46%
6M
-11.12%
1Y
9.44%
3Y*
3.21%
5Y*
10Y*

ECNS

1D
1.81%
1M
-6.73%
YTD
1.03%
6M
-12.80%
1Y
25.53%
3Y*
5.23%
5Y*
-5.25%
10Y*
2.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


JCHI vs. ECNS - Expense Ratio Comparison

JCHI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ECNS's 0.59% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

JCHI vs. ECNS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JCHI
JCHI Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
JCHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JCHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
JCHI Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
JCHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
JCHI Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

ECNS
ECNS Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
ECNS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECNS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECNS Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
ECNS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECNS Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JCHI vs. ECNS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Active China ETF (JCHI) and iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JCHIECNSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.46

1.02

-0.56

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.74

1.42

-0.68

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.21

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.57

1.59

-1.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.66

3.54

-1.87

JCHI vs. ECNS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JCHI Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the ECNS Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JCHI and ECNS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JCHIECNSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

1.02

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.04

+0.15

Correlation

The correlation between JCHI and ECNS is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

JCHI vs. ECNS - Dividend Comparison

JCHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, less than ECNS's 6.14% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JCHI
JPMorgan Active China ETF
1.89%1.81%2.12%2.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ECNS
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF
6.14%6.20%5.98%4.89%3.54%4.87%3.59%3.23%6.16%3.18%4.29%3.58%

Drawdowns

JCHI vs. ECNS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JCHI drawdown since its inception was -29.57%, smaller than the maximum ECNS drawdown of -63.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JCHI and ECNS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


JCHIECNSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.57%

-63.43%

+33.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.93%

-16.93%

+1.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.98%

-34.96%

+22.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.67%

-29.33%

+15.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.64%

7.63%

-1.99%

Volatility

JCHI vs. ECNS - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Active China ETF (JCHI) and iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS) have volatilities of 5.77% and 5.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


JCHIECNSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.77%

5.98%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.55%

15.21%

-2.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.80%

25.26%

-4.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.16%

29.43%

-4.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.16%

26.05%

-0.89%