JCHI vs. DRGN

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

JCHI (JPMorgan Active China ETF) and DRGN (Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JCHI is a China Equities fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while DRGN is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BITA China Generative AI Select Index. JCHI is actively managed, while DRGN is passively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JCHI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for DRGN.

Performance

JCHI vs. DRGN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Active China ETF (JCHI) and Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (DRGN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JCHI achieves a -4.08% return, which is significantly lower than DRGN's 12.74% return.

JCHI

• 1D: -2.49%
• 1M: -3.91%
• YTD: -4.08%
• 6M: -4.86%
• 1Y: 11.15%
• 3Y*: 7.77%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DRGN

• 1D: -4.16%
• 1M: -1.59%
• YTD: 12.74%
• 6M: 14.79%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JCHI vs. DRGN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
JCHI JPMorgan Active China ETF	-4.08%	12.28%
DRGN Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF	12.74%	26.96%

Correlation

The correlation between JCHI and DRGN is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025	0.69

Return for Risk

JCHI vs. DRGN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JCHI

JCHI Risk / Return Rank: 18
JCHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
JCHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
JCHI Omega Ratio Rank: 18
JCHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
JCHI Martin Ratio Rank: 17

DRGN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JCHI vs. DRGN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Active China ETF (JCHI) and Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (DRGN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JCHI	DRGN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.62	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.97	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.78	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.77	—	—

Drawdowns

JCHI vs. DRGN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JCHI drawdown since its inception was -29.57%, which is greater than DRGN's maximum drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JCHI and DRGN.

Drawdown Indicators

	JCHI	DRGN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.57%	-20.86%	-8.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.37%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.47%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.62%	-10.09%	-1.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.27%	-8.05%	-5.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.32%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	JCHI	DRGN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.24%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.14%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.09%	35.21%	-17.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.82%	35.21%	-10.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.82%	35.21%	-10.39%

JCHI vs. DRGN - Expense Ratio Comparison

JCHI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than DRGN's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

JCHI vs. DRGN - Dividend Comparison

JCHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, more than DRGN's 1.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
DRGN Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF	1.08%	1.22%	0.00%	0.00%
JCHI JPMorgan Active China ETF	1.89%	1.81%	2.12%	2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JCHI and DRGN in my portfolio?

JCHI and DRGN have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, JCHI or DRGN?

On fees, DRGN is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JCHI or DRGN?

DRGN is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for JCHI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JCHI or DRGN?

JCHI has the higher dividend yield at 1.89%, compared with 1.08% for DRGN.

What is the main difference between JCHI and DRGN?

JCHI is categorized as China Equities, while DRGN is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for JCHI and 0.39% for DRGN.