JCCIX vs. JAKVX
JCCIX (John Hancock Small Cap Core Fund) and JAKVX (John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6) are both mutual funds - JCCIX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by John Hancock, while JAKVX is a Long-Short fund actively managed by John Hancock. Over the past year, JCCIX returned 28.22% vs 27.08% for JAKVX. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JCCIX charges 0.98%/yr vs 1.54%/yr for JAKVX.
Performance
JCCIX vs. JAKVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JCCIX achieves a 17.92% return, which is significantly higher than JAKVX's 13.36% return.
JCCIX
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 4.68%
- YTD
- 17.92%
- 6M
- 19.87%
- 1Y
- 28.22%
- 3Y*
- 12.29%
- 5Y*
- 4.26%
- 10Y*
- 10.33%
JAKVX
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 1.79%
- YTD
- 13.36%
- 6M
- 14.38%
- 1Y
- 27.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JCCIX vs. JAKVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JCCIX John Hancock Small Cap Core Fund | 17.92% | 13.65% |
JAKVX John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 | 13.36% | 17.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between JCCIX and JAKVX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JCCIX vs. JAKVX — Risk / Return Rank
JCCIX
JAKVX
JCCIX vs. JAKVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Small Cap Core Fund (JCCIX) and John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 (JAKVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JCCIX | JAKVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.53 | 3.76 | -2.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.22 | 5.36 | -3.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.76 | -0.49 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.60 | 5.46 | -2.86 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.28 | 19.21 | -10.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JCCIX | JAKVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.53 | 3.76 | -2.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 4.09 | -3.66 |
Drawdowns
JCCIX vs. JAKVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JCCIX drawdown since its inception was -38.69%, which is greater than JAKVX's maximum drawdown of -5.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JCCIX and JAKVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JCCIX | JAKVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.69% | -5.16% | -33.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.42% | -5.16% | -5.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.09% | -0.33% | -0.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.61% | -0.80% | -6.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.27% | 1.47% | +1.80% |
Volatility
JCCIX vs. JAKVX - Volatility Comparison
John Hancock Small Cap Core Fund (JCCIX) has a higher volatility of 5.00% compared to John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 (JAKVX) at 2.46%. This indicates that JCCIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JAKVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JCCIX | JAKVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.00% | 2.46% | +2.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.79% | 5.88% | +6.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.45% | 7.50% | +10.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.60% | 7.33% | +14.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.48% | 7.33% | +14.15% |
JCCIX vs. JAKVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JCCIX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than JAKVX's 1.54% expense ratio.
Dividends
JCCIX vs. JAKVX - Dividend Comparison
JCCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, less than JAKVX's 7.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JAKVX John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 | 7.48% | 8.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JCCIX John Hancock Small Cap Core Fund | 3.84% | 4.53% | 0.96% | 0.83% | 0.99% | 12.20% | 1.43% | 0.00% | 5.55% | 11.90% | 0.73% | 1.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JCCIX and JAKVX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JCCIX has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to JAKVX (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JCCIX dropped -38.69% vs JAKVX's -5.16%.
JAKVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.76 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JCCIX and JAKVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer