JBTM vs. COP

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

JBTM (JBTMarel Corp) and COP (ConocoPhillips Company) are both stocks. JBTM operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while COP operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy). Over the past 10 years, JBTM returned 8.45%/yr vs 13.69%/yr for COP. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

JBTM vs. COP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JBTMarel Corp (JBTM) and ConocoPhillips Company (COP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JBTM achieves a -13.75% return, which is significantly lower than COP's 26.75% return. Over the past 10 years, JBTM has underperformed COP with an annualized return of 8.45%, while COP has yielded a comparatively higher 13.69% annualized return.

JBTM

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 12.49%
• YTD: -13.75%
• 6M: -7.13%
• 1Y: 15.36%
• 3Y*: 4.16%
• 5Y*: -1.79%
• 10Y*: 8.45%

COP

• 1D: 1.12%
• 1M: -4.43%
• YTD: 26.75%
• 6M: 32.89%
• 1Y: 39.23%
• 3Y*: 8.02%
• 5Y*: 18.66%
• 10Y*: 13.69%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JBTM vs. COP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JBTM JBTMarel Corp	-13.75%	18.90%	28.31%	9.29%	-40.30%	35.24%	1.50%	57.49%	-34.91%	29.48%
COP ConocoPhillips Company	26.75%	-2.34%	-12.02%	1.98%	71.69%	86.60%	-36.04%	6.63%	15.63%	11.95%

Correlation

The correlation between JBTM and COP is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2008	0.35

The correlation between JBTM and COP shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap JBTM : $6.80B COP : $143.16B
EPS JBTM : $3.20 COP : $5.90
PE Ratio JBTM : 40.52 COP : 19.81
PEG Ratio JBTM : 0.58 COP : 1.14
PS Ratio JBTM : 1.75 COP : 2.49
PB Ratio JBTM : 1.52 COP : 2.22
Total Revenue (TTM) JBTM : $3.88B COP : $58.31B
Gross Profit (TTM) JBTM : $1.37B COP : $17.02B
EBITDA (TTM) JBTM : $486.10M COP : $22.44B

Return for Risk

JBTM vs. COP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JBTM

JBTM Risk / Return Rank: 52
JBTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
JBTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
JBTM Omega Ratio Rank: 49
JBTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
JBTM Martin Ratio Rank: 52

COP

COP Risk / Return Rank: 76
COP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
COP Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
COP Omega Ratio Rank: 68
COP Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
COP Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JBTM vs. COP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JBTMarel Corp (JBTM) and ConocoPhillips Company (COP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JBTM	COP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.41	1.35	-0.94
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.93	1.90	-0.97
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.22	-0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.42	2.78	-2.36
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.09	6.38	-5.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JBTM vs. COP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JBTM Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the COP Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JBTM and COP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JBTM	COP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41	1.35	-0.94
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.05	0.57	-0.62
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.20	0.36	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	0.23	+0.10

Drawdowns

JBTM vs. COP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JBTM drawdown since its inception was -59.26%, smaller than the maximum COP drawdown of -84.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JBTM and COP.

Drawdown Indicators

	JBTM	COP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.26%	-84.55%	+25.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.46%	-14.90%	-16.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.24%	-36.19%	+3.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.39%	-36.19%	-16.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.39%	-70.66%	+18.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.02%	-12.00%	-12.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.44%	-25.49%	+8.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.19%	6.50%	+5.69%

Volatility

JBTM vs. COP - Volatility Comparison

JBTMarel Corp (JBTM) has a higher volatility of 15.68% compared to ConocoPhillips Company (COP) at 8.82%. This indicates that JBTM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JBTM	COP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.68%	8.82%	+6.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.50%	22.80%	+5.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.39%	29.26%	+8.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.37%	32.71%	+5.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.72%	37.68%	+4.04%

Dividends

JBTM vs. COP - Dividend Comparison

JBTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than COP's 2.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COP ConocoPhillips Company	2.82%	3.40%	3.35%	3.37%	4.23%	2.70%	4.23%	2.05%	1.86%	1.93%	1.99%	6.30%
JBTM JBTMarel Corp	0.31%	0.27%	0.31%	0.40%	0.44%	0.26%	0.35%	0.36%	0.56%	0.36%	0.47%	0.74%

Financials

JBTM vs. COP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between JBTMarel Corp and ConocoPhillips Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

JBTM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, JBTMarel Corp reported a gross profit of 329.00M and revenue of 936.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.2%.

COP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ConocoPhillips Company reported a gross profit of 7.50B and revenue of 16.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.7%.

JBTM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, JBTMarel Corp reported an operating income of 68.00M and revenue of 936.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.3%.

COP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ConocoPhillips Company reported an operating income of 3.36B and revenue of 16.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.0%.

JBTM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, JBTMarel Corp reported a net income of 45.00M and revenue of 936.00M, resulting in a net margin of 4.8%.

COP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ConocoPhillips Company reported a net income of 2.18B and revenue of 16.05B, resulting in a net margin of 13.6%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JBTM and COP in my portfolio?

JBTM and COP have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JBTM or COP?

JBTM has higher volatility (15.68%) compared to COP (8.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JBTM dropped -59.26% vs COP's -84.55%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

COP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.