PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JBND vs. DMBS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JBND vs. DMBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF (JBND) and Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF (DMBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JBND achieves a 0.22% return, which is significantly lower than DMBS's 0.51% return.


JBND

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.27%
YTD
0.22%
6M
0.25%
1Y
5.68%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DMBS

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.21%
YTD
0.51%
6M
0.61%
1Y
6.86%
3Y*
4.62%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JBND vs. DMBS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
JBND
Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF
0.22%8.21%3.19%7.76%
DMBS
Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF
0.51%8.54%2.09%7.72%

Correlation

The correlation between JBND and DMBS is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2023

0.93

The correlation between JBND and DMBS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JBND vs. DMBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JBND
JBND Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
JBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
JBND Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
JBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
JBND Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

DMBS
DMBS Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
DMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
DMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JBND vs. DMBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF (JBND) and Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF (DMBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JBNDDMBSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.30

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

2.15

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.97

7.62

-1.65

JBND vs. DMBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JBND Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the DMBS Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JBND and DMBS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JBNDDMBSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

1.65

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.53

0.62

+0.91

Drawdowns

JBND vs. DMBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JBND drawdown since its inception was -4.48%, smaller than the maximum DMBS drawdown of -8.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JBND and DMBS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JBNDDMBSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.48%

-8.14%

+3.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.94%

-3.20%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.74%

-1.59%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.15%

-1.70%

+0.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

0.90%

+0.05%

Volatility

JBND vs. DMBS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF (JBND) is 1.20%, while Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF (DMBS) has a volatility of 1.61%. This indicates that JBND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DMBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JBNDDMBSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.20%

1.61%

-0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.67%

3.02%

-0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.82%

4.18%

-0.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.84%

6.28%

-1.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.84%

6.28%

-1.44%

JBND vs. DMBS - Expense Ratio Comparison

JBND has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than DMBS's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

JBND vs. DMBS - Dividend Comparison

JBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, less than DMBS's 5.12% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
DMBS
Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF
5.12%4.96%4.97%2.82%
JBND
Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF
4.41%4.42%4.58%1.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, JBND and DMBS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DMBS has higher volatility (1.61%) compared to JBND (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JBND dropped -4.48% vs DMBS's -8.14%.

On 1-year performance, DMBS leads with 6.86% vs 5.68% for JBND. On fees, JBND is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, JBND has been the lower-risk option at 1.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DMBS has performed better with a 6.86% return vs 5.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JBND is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for DMBS.

DMBS has the higher dividend yield at 5.12%, compared with 4.41% for JBND.

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JBND and 0.49% for DMBS.

DMBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JBND and DMBS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer