PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DMBS vs. DABS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DMBS vs. DABS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF (DMBS) and DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DMBS achieves a 0.71% return, which is significantly lower than DABS's 1.08% return.


DMBS

1D
0.09%
1M
0.10%
YTD
0.71%
6M
0.96%
1Y
7.09%
3Y*
4.69%
5Y*
10Y*

DABS

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.25%
YTD
1.08%
6M
1.49%
1Y
5.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DMBS vs. DABS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DMBS and DABS is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2025

0.73

The correlation between DMBS and DABS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DMBS vs. DABS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DMBS
DMBS Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
DMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
DMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

DABS
DABS Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
DABS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DABS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
DABS Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
DABS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
DABS Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DMBS vs. DABS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF (DMBS) and DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DMBSDABSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.71

2.35

-0.64

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.57

3.64

-1.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.49

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

4.44

-2.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.60

15.41

-7.81

DMBS vs. DABS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DMBS Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the DABS Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DMBS and DABS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DMBSDABSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.71

2.35

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

2.12

-1.49

Drawdowns

DMBS vs. DABS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DMBS drawdown since its inception was -8.14%, which is greater than DABS's maximum drawdown of -1.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMBS and DABS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DMBSDABSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.14%

-1.47%

-6.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.20%

-1.29%

-1.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.39%

-0.29%

-1.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.70%

-0.31%

-1.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

0.37%

+0.53%

Volatility

DMBS vs. DABS - Volatility Comparison

Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF (DMBS) has a higher volatility of 1.63% compared to DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS) at 0.70%. This indicates that DMBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DABS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DMBSDABSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.63%

0.70%

+0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.04%

1.60%

+1.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.19%

2.48%

+1.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.28%

2.56%

+3.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.28%

2.56%

+3.72%

DMBS vs. DABS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DMBS has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than DABS's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

DMBS vs. DABS - Dividend Comparison

DMBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.11%, more than DABS's 4.88% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
DABS
DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF
4.88%3.81%0.00%0.00%
DMBS
Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF
5.11%4.96%4.97%2.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


DMBS and DABS have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DMBS has higher volatility (1.63%) compared to DABS (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMBS dropped -8.14% vs DABS's -1.47%.

On 1-year performance, DMBS leads with 7.09% vs 5.81% for DABS. On fees, DABS is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, DABS has been the lower-risk option at 0.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DMBS has performed better with a 7.09% return vs 5.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DABS is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for DMBS.

DMBS has the higher dividend yield at 5.11%, compared with 4.88% for DABS.

DMBS is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while DABS is Nontraditional Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for DMBS and 0.40% for DABS.

DABS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DMBS and DABS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer