JBBB vs. VRIG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JBBB (Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF) and VRIG (Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JBBB is a CLO fund actively managed by Janus Henderson, while VRIG is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Invesco. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, JBBB returned 10.60%/yr vs 5.98%/yr for VRIG. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JBBB charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for VRIG.

Performance

JBBB vs. VRIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB) and Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF (VRIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with JBBB having a 1.86% return and VRIG slightly lower at 1.81%.

JBBB

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.62%
• YTD: 1.86%
• 6M: 2.34%
• 1Y: 5.67%
• 3Y*: 10.60%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VRIG

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.39%
• YTD: 1.81%
• 6M: 2.20%
• 1Y: 4.99%
• 3Y*: 5.98%
• 5Y*: 4.42%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JBBB vs. VRIG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
JBBB Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF	1.86%	5.43%	12.50%	17.63%	-5.99%
VRIG Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF	1.81%	5.05%	6.81%	7.37%	0.95%

Correlation

The correlation between JBBB and VRIG is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2022	0.13

JBBB vs. VRIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JBBB	VRIG
Financial Services	4.2%	23.3%
Basic Materials	-	0.8%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	3.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.7%
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	0.0%
Real Estate	-	0.3%
Technology	-	0.4%
Utilities	-	0.1%

Return for Risk

JBBB vs. VRIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JBBB

JBBB Risk / Return Rank: 51
JBBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
JBBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
JBBB Omega Ratio Rank: 59
JBBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
JBBB Martin Ratio Rank: 47

VRIG

VRIG Risk / Return Rank: 99
VRIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
VRIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
VRIG Omega Ratio Rank: 99
VRIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
VRIG Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JBBB vs. VRIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB) and Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF (VRIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JBBB	VRIG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.70	10.15	-8.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.74	24.59	-21.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	5.38	-4.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.31	62.75	-60.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.84	320.64	-312.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JBBB vs. VRIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JBBB Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is lower than the VRIG Sharpe Ratio of 10.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JBBB and VRIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JBBB	VRIG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.70	10.15	-8.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	3.45	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.31	0.91	+0.39

Drawdowns

JBBB vs. VRIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JBBB drawdown since its inception was -10.57%, smaller than the maximum VRIG drawdown of -13.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JBBB and VRIG.

Drawdown Indicators

	JBBB	VRIG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.57%	-13.04%	+2.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.46%	-0.08%	-2.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.82%	-0.78%	-3.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-2.28%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.58%	-0.27%	-1.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.72%	0.02%	+0.70%

Volatility

JBBB vs. VRIG - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB) has a higher volatility of 0.45% compared to Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF (VRIG) at 0.11%. This indicates that JBBB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JBBB	VRIG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.45%	0.11%	+0.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.76%	0.36%	+2.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.34%	0.49%	+2.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.26%	1.29%	+3.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.26%	3.80%	+1.46%

JBBB vs. VRIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

JBBB has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than VRIG's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

JBBB vs. VRIG - Dividend Comparison

JBBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.13%, more than VRIG's 4.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
JBBB Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF	7.13%	8.41%	9.24%	8.71%	5.71%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VRIG Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF	4.79%	4.99%	6.09%	5.97%	2.39%	0.78%	1.57%	3.12%	2.89%	2.31%	0.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JBBB and VRIG in my portfolio?

JBBB and VRIG have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JBBB or VRIG?

JBBB has higher volatility (0.45%) compared to VRIG (0.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JBBB dropped -10.57% vs VRIG's -13.04%.

Which ETF is better, JBBB or VRIG?

On 3-year performance, JBBB leads with 10.60% vs 5.98% for VRIG. On fees, VRIG is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, VRIG has been the lower-risk option at 0.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JBBB or VRIG?

Over the 3-year period, JBBB has performed better with a 10.60% return vs 5.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JBBB or VRIG?

VRIG is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for JBBB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JBBB or VRIG?

JBBB has the higher dividend yield at 7.13%, compared with 4.79% for VRIG.

What is the main difference between JBBB and VRIG?

JBBB is categorized as CLO, while VRIG is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for JBBB and 0.30% for VRIG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VRIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.15 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.