PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JBBB vs. RSBY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JBBB vs. RSBY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB) and Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JBBB achieves a 2.31% return, which is significantly lower than RSBY's 18.52% return.


JBBB

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.28%
6M
1.68%
YTD
2.31%
1Y
4.72%
3Y*
8.60%
5Y*
10Y*

RSBY

1D
-0.60%
1M
-0.71%
6M
17.92%
YTD
18.52%
1Y
17.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JBBB vs. RSBY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
JBBB
Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF
2.31%4.40%4.20%
RSBY
Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF
18.52%-12.98%-7.79%

Correlation

The correlation between JBBB and RSBY is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2024

-0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JBBB vs. RSBY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JBBB
JBBB Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
JBBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JBBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
JBBB Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
JBBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
JBBB Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

RSBY
RSBY Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
RSBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSBY Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
RSBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSBY Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JBBB vs. RSBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB) and Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JBBBRSBYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.26

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

2.15

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.43

5.04

+1.39

JBBB vs. RSBY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JBBB Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the RSBY Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JBBB and RSBY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JBBB vs. RSBY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JBBB drawdown since its inception was -10.79%, smaller than the maximum RSBY drawdown of -23.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JBBB and RSBY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JBBBRSBYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.79%

-23.32%

+12.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.46%

-7.95%

+5.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

-6.45%

+6.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.68%

-13.35%

+11.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.74%

3.39%

-2.65%

Volatility

JBBB vs. RSBY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB) is 1.27%, while Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY) has a volatility of 3.15%. This indicates that JBBB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JBBBRSBYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.27%

3.15%

-1.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.07%

8.37%

-5.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.52%

11.41%

-7.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.19%

13.37%

-8.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.19%

13.37%

-8.18%

JBBB vs. RSBY - Expense Ratio Comparison

JBBB has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than RSBY's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

JBBB vs. RSBY - Dividend Comparison

JBBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.48%, more than RSBY's 1.75% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
JBBB
Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF
6.48%7.41%7.65%8.10%5.03%
RSBY
Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF
1.75%2.07%2.29%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JBBB and RSBY have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSBY has higher volatility (3.15%) compared to JBBB (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JBBB dropped -10.79% vs RSBY's -23.32%.

On 1-year performance, RSBY leads with 17.35% vs 4.72% for JBBB. On fees, JBBB is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, JBBB has been the lower-risk option at 1.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RSBY has performed better with a 17.35% return vs 4.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JBBB is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for RSBY.

JBBB has the higher dividend yield at 6.48%, compared with 1.75% for RSBY.

JBBB is categorized as CLO, while RSBY is Multistrategy. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for JBBB and 0.98% for RSBY.

RSBY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JBBB and RSBY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer