JBBB vs. AAAC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JBBB (Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF) and AAAC (Columbia AAA CLO ETF) are both CLO funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JBBB charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for AAAC.

Performance

JBBB vs. AAAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB) and Columbia AAA CLO ETF (AAAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JBBB achieves a 1.86% return, which is significantly lower than AAAC's 2.06% return.

JBBB

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.62%
• YTD: 1.86%
• 6M: 2.34%
• 1Y: 5.67%
• 3Y*: 10.60%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AAAC

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.35%
• YTD: 2.06%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JBBB vs. AAAC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
JBBB Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF	1.86%	0.37%
AAAC Columbia AAA CLO ETF	2.06%	0.20%

Correlation

The correlation between JBBB and AAAC is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025	0.08

Return for Risk

JBBB vs. AAAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JBBB

JBBB Risk / Return Rank: 51
JBBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
JBBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
JBBB Omega Ratio Rank: 59
JBBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
JBBB Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JBBB vs. AAAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB) and Columbia AAA CLO ETF (AAAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JBBB	AAAC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.70	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.74	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.31	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.84	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JBBB	AAAC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.70	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.31	5.56	-4.26

Drawdowns

JBBB vs. AAAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JBBB drawdown since its inception was -10.57%, which is greater than AAAC's maximum drawdown of -0.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JBBB and AAAC.

Drawdown Indicators

	JBBB	AAAC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.57%	-0.55%	-10.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.46%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.58%	-0.04%	-1.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.72%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	JBBB	AAAC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.45%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.76%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.34%	0.89%	+2.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.26%	0.89%	+4.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.26%	0.89%	+4.37%

JBBB vs. AAAC - Expense Ratio Comparison

JBBB has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than AAAC's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

JBBB vs. AAAC - Dividend Comparison

JBBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.13%, more than AAAC's 2.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
AAAC Columbia AAA CLO ETF	2.27%	0.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
JBBB Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF	7.13%	8.41%	9.24%	8.71%	5.71%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JBBB and AAAC in my portfolio?

JBBB and AAAC have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, JBBB or AAAC?

On fees, AAAC is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JBBB or AAAC?

AAAC is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for JBBB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JBBB or AAAC?

JBBB has the higher dividend yield at 7.13%, compared with 2.27% for AAAC.

What is the main difference between JBBB and AAAC?

They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and Columbia Threadneedle. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for JBBB and 0.20% for AAAC.