JAWWX vs. JGLTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson Global Research Fund Class T (JAWWX) and Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX).
JAWWX is an actively managed fund by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Feb 25, 2005. JGLTX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Jan 17, 2000.
Performance
JAWWX vs. JGLTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JAWWX vs. JGLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JAWWX Janus Henderson Global Research Fund Class T | -5.19% | 20.67% | 23.40% | 26.66% | -19.64% | 17.72% | 20.09% | 28.78% | -6.97% | 26.75% |
JGLTX Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio | -7.02% | 25.19% | 32.10% | 54.55% | -36.42% | 18.28% | 50.42% | 45.29% | 1.17% | 45.17% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JAWWX achieves a -5.19% return, which is significantly higher than JGLTX's -7.02% return. Over the past 10 years, JAWWX has underperformed JGLTX with an annualized return of 12.46%, while JGLTX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.70% annualized return.
JAWWX
- 1D
- 3.06%
- 1M
- -6.02%
- YTD
- -5.19%
- 6M
- -3.55%
- 1Y
- 15.60%
- 3Y*
- 18.07%
- 5Y*
- 10.08%
- 10Y*
- 12.46%
JGLTX
- 1D
- 3.97%
- 1M
- -7.40%
- YTD
- -7.02%
- 6M
- -6.55%
- 1Y
- 27.79%
- 3Y*
- 24.91%
- 5Y*
- 11.25%
- 10Y*
- 20.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JAWWX vs. JGLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JAWWX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than JGLTX's 0.72% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JAWWX vs. JGLTX — Risk / Return Rank
JAWWX
JGLTX
JAWWX vs. JGLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Global Research Fund Class T (JAWWX) and Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JAWWX | JGLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.92 | 1.17 | -0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.41 | 1.74 | -0.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.24 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.40 | 1.81 | -0.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.00 | 6.15 | -0.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JAWWX | JGLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 | 1.17 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.44 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.85 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.30 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between JAWWX and JGLTX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JAWWX vs. JGLTX - Dividend Comparison
JAWWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.47%, less than JGLTX's 9.66% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JAWWX Janus Henderson Global Research Fund Class T | 8.47% | 8.03% | 8.21% | 4.82% | 4.44% | 11.58% | 3.68% | 4.77% | 6.85% | 0.60% | 0.75% | 0.75% |
JGLTX Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio | 9.66% | 8.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 26.96% | 14.48% | 7.71% | 6.81% | 4.95% | 5.68% | 3.71% | 16.11% |
Drawdowns
JAWWX vs. JGLTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JAWWX drawdown since its inception was -76.60%, smaller than the maximum JGLTX drawdown of -81.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAWWX and JGLTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JAWWX | JGLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.60% | -81.78% | +5.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.44% | -15.81% | +4.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.05% | -45.18% | +16.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.79% | -45.18% | +10.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.05% | -12.47% | +4.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.03% | -36.82% | +10.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.67% | 4.65% | -1.98% |
Volatility
JAWWX vs. JGLTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Janus Henderson Global Research Fund Class T (JAWWX) is 6.01%, while Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX) has a volatility of 8.22%. This indicates that JAWWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JGLTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JAWWX | JGLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.01% | 8.22% | -2.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.80% | 16.11% | -6.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.61% | 25.28% | -7.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.42% | 25.93% | -8.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.97% | 24.31% | -6.34% |