JAVA vs. FNDX
JAVA (JPMorgan Active Value ETF) and FNDX (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. JAVA is actively managed, while FNDX is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JAVA returned 16.35%/yr vs 20.90%/yr for FNDX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. JAVA charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDX.
Performance
JAVA vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JAVA achieves a 8.50% return, which is significantly lower than FNDX's 14.57% return.
JAVA
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 8.50%
- 6M
- 9.14%
- 1Y
- 23.95%
- 3Y*
- 16.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNDX
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 3.88%
- YTD
- 14.57%
- 6M
- 14.58%
- 1Y
- 32.32%
- 3Y*
- 20.90%
- 5Y*
- 12.82%
- 10Y*
- 14.26%
JAVA vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JAVA JPMorgan Active Value ETF | 8.50% | 14.92% | 15.52% | 10.46% | -0.88% | 5.23% |
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 14.57% | 16.94% | 16.77% | 18.23% | -6.92% | 7.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between JAVA and FNDX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2021 | 0.97 |
The correlation between JAVA and FNDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
JAVA vs. FNDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JAVA
FNDX
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Financial Services
JAVA
FNDX
Technology
JAVA
FNDX
Industrials
JAVA
FNDX
Healthcare
JAVA
FNDX
Consumer Cyclical
JAVA
FNDX
Communication Services
JAVA
FNDX
Energy
JAVA
FNDX
Consumer Defensive
JAVA
FNDX
Utilities
JAVA
FNDX
Basic Materials
JAVA
FNDX
Real Estate
JAVA
FNDX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JAVA vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank
JAVA
FNDX
JAVA vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Active Value ETF (JAVA) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JAVA | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.59 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.90 | 5.35 | -2.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.71 | 20.97 | -10.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JAVA | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.15 | 3.18 | -1.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.79 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
JAVA vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JAVA drawdown since its inception was -16.54%, smaller than the maximum FNDX drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAVA and FNDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JAVA | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.54% | -37.72% | +21.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.29% | -6.06% | -2.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.54% | -16.30% | -0.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | -0.13% | -0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.63% | -3.55% | -0.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | 1.55% | +0.69% |
Volatility
JAVA vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan Active Value ETF (JAVA) has a higher volatility of 2.60% compared to Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) at 2.25%. This indicates that JAVA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JAVA | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.60% | 2.25% | +0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.40% | 7.25% | +1.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.19% | 10.22% | +0.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.80% | 15.18% | -0.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.80% | 17.50% | -2.70% |
JAVA vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JAVA has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
JAVA vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison
JAVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than FNDX's 1.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 1.45% | 1.63% | 1.76% | 1.82% | 2.07% | 1.64% | 2.29% | 2.23% | 2.40% | 1.86% | 2.01% | 2.01% |
JAVA JPMorgan Active Value ETF | 1.25% | 1.34% | 1.45% | 1.65% | 1.25% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, JAVA and FNDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
JAVA has higher volatility (2.60%) compared to FNDX (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JAVA dropped -16.54% vs FNDX's -37.72%.
On 3-year performance, FNDX leads with 20.90% vs 16.35% for JAVA. On fees, FNDX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FNDX has been the lower-risk option at 2.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FNDX has performed better with a 20.90% return vs 16.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FNDX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for JAVA.
FNDX has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 1.25% for JAVA.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for JAVA and 0.25% for FNDX.
FNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JAVA and FNDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer