JAVA vs. CGDV

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

JAVA (JPMorgan Active Value ETF) and CGDV (Capital Group Dividend Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, JAVA returned 15.81%/yr vs 22.55%/yr for CGDV. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. JAVA charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CGDV.

Performance

JAVA vs. CGDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Active Value ETF (JAVA) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with JAVA having a 14.35% return and CGDV slightly lower at 14.16%.

JAVA

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: 1.72%
• 6M: 9.39%
• YTD: 14.35%
• 1Y: 27.64%
• 3Y*: 15.81%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.25%

CGDV

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: 1.21%
• 6M: 11.03%
• YTD: 14.16%
• 1Y: 25.16%
• 3Y*: 22.55%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF	$192.53M	$192.47M	$184.78M
JAVA JPMorgan Active Value ETF	$49.99M	$37.38M	$36.05M

JAVA vs. CGDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
JAVA JPMorgan Active Value ETF	14.35%	14.92%	15.52%	10.46%	0.06%
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF	14.16%	25.50%	20.10%	28.81%	-0.44%

Correlation

The correlation between JAVA and CGDV is 0.80, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022	0.90

The correlation between JAVA and CGDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

JAVA vs. CGDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JAVA	CGDV
Technology	19.3%	34.5%
Financial Services	19.0%	6.7%
Healthcare	13.6%	8.2%
Consumer Cyclical	13.2%	12.6%
Industrials	12.8%	13.6%
Communication Services	4.5%	9.8%
Utilities	3.8%	1.0%
Consumer Defensive	3.7%	5.8%
Real Estate	3.5%	1.0%
Energy	3.3%	3.9%
Basic Materials	3.2%	2.8%

Return for Risk

JAVA vs. CGDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JAVA

JAVA Risk / Return Rank: 87
JAVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
JAVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
JAVA Omega Ratio Rank: 88
JAVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
JAVA Martin Ratio Rank: 85

CGDV

CGDV Risk / Return Rank: 80
CGDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
CGDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
CGDV Omega Ratio Rank: 82
CGDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
CGDV Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JAVA vs. CGDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Active Value ETF (JAVA) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JAVA	CGDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.23	1.90	+0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.13	2.65	+0.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.35	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.13	2.44	+0.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.87	11.39	+0.49

JAVA vs. CGDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JAVA Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the CGDV Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JAVA and CGDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JAVA vs. CGDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JAVA drawdown since its inception was -16.54%, smaller than the maximum CGDV drawdown of -21.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAVA and CGDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	JAVA	CGDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.54%	-21.82%	+5.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.29%	-9.75%	+1.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.54%	-14.28%	-2.26%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.53%	-3.52%	-0.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.19%	2.09%	+0.10%

Volatility

JAVA vs. CGDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Active Value ETF (JAVA) is 3.04%, while Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) has a volatility of 3.28%. This indicates that JAVA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JAVA	CGDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.04%	3.28%	-0.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.63%	10.06%	-1.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.65%	12.55%	-0.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.72%	15.48%	-0.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.72%	15.48%	-0.76%

JAVA vs. CGDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

JAVA has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than CGDV's 0.33% expense ratio.

Dividends

JAVA vs. CGDV - Dividend Comparison

JAVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, which matches CGDV's 1.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF	1.18%	1.29%	1.60%	1.65%	1.36%	0.00%
JAVA JPMorgan Active Value ETF	1.18%	1.34%	1.45%	1.65%	1.25%	0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JAVA and CGDV in my portfolio?

JAVA and CGDV have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JAVA or CGDV?

CGDV has higher volatility (3.28%) compared to JAVA (3.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JAVA dropped -16.54% vs CGDV's -21.82%.

Which ETF is better, JAVA or CGDV?

On 3-year performance, CGDV leads with 22.55% vs 15.81% for JAVA. On fees, CGDV is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, JAVA has been the lower-risk option at 3.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JAVA or CGDV?

Over the 3-year period, CGDV has performed better with a 22.55% return vs 15.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JAVA or CGDV?

CGDV is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for JAVA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JAVA or CGDV?

JAVA and CGDV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 1.18%.

What is the main difference between JAVA and CGDV?

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for JAVA and 0.33% for CGDV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JAVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.