JAVA vs. CGDV
JAVA (JPMorgan Active Value ETF) and CGDV (Capital Group Dividend Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, JAVA returned 16.59%/yr vs 24.17%/yr for CGDV. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JAVA charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CGDV.
Performance
JAVA vs. CGDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JAVA achieves a 10.04% return, which is significantly lower than CGDV's 11.07% return.
JAVA
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 2.65%
- YTD
- 10.04%
- 6M
- 9.09%
- 1Y
- 23.62%
- 3Y*
- 16.59%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CGDV
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- 11.07%
- 6M
- 10.39%
- 1Y
- 27.24%
- 3Y*
- 24.17%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JAVA vs. CGDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JAVA JPMorgan Active Value ETF | 10.04% | 14.92% | 15.52% | 10.46% | 0.06% |
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | 11.07% | 25.50% | 20.10% | 28.81% | -0.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between JAVA and CGDV is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022 | 0.90 |
The correlation between JAVA and CGDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
JAVA vs. CGDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JAVA
CGDV
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Financial Services
JAVA
CGDV
Technology
JAVA
CGDV
Industrials
JAVA
CGDV
Healthcare
JAVA
CGDV
Consumer Cyclical
JAVA
CGDV
Communication Services
JAVA
CGDV
Consumer Defensive
JAVA
CGDV
Energy
JAVA
CGDV
Utilities
JAVA
CGDV
Real Estate
JAVA
CGDV
Basic Materials
JAVA
CGDV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JAVA vs. CGDV — Risk / Return Rank
JAVA
CGDV
JAVA vs. CGDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Active Value ETF (JAVA) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JAVA | CGDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.41 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.86 | 2.81 | +0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.52 | 13.07 | -2.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JAVA vs. CGDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JAVA drawdown since its inception was -16.54%, smaller than the maximum CGDV drawdown of -21.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAVA and CGDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JAVA | CGDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.54% | -21.82% | +5.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.29% | -9.75% | +1.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.54% | -14.28% | -2.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.34% | -1.79% | +0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.60% | -3.59% | -0.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.25% | 2.09% | +0.16% |
Volatility
JAVA vs. CGDV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Active Value ETF (JAVA) is 4.04%, while Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) has a volatility of 4.64%. This indicates that JAVA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JAVA | CGDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.04% | 4.64% | -0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.91% | 9.92% | -1.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.65% | 12.28% | -0.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.82% | 15.57% | -0.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.82% | 15.57% | -0.75% |
JAVA vs. CGDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
JAVA has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than CGDV's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
JAVA vs. CGDV - Dividend Comparison
JAVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, more than CGDV's 1.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | 1.18% | 1.29% | 1.60% | 1.65% | 1.36% | 0.00% |
JAVA JPMorgan Active Value ETF | 1.23% | 1.34% | 1.45% | 1.65% | 1.25% | 0.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JAVA and CGDV have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CGDV has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to JAVA (4.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JAVA dropped -16.54% vs CGDV's -21.82%.
On 3-year performance, CGDV leads with 24.17% vs 16.59% for JAVA. On fees, CGDV is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, JAVA has been the lower-risk option at 4.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CGDV has performed better with a 24.17% return vs 16.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CGDV is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for JAVA.
JAVA has the higher dividend yield at 1.23%, compared with 1.18% for CGDV.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for JAVA and 0.33% for CGDV.
CGDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JAVA and CGDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer