PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JANZ vs. NVDO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JANZ vs. NVDO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF (JANZ) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JANZ achieves a 6.09% return, which is significantly lower than NVDO's 16.35% return.


JANZ

1D
-1.06%
1M
-1.00%
YTD
6.09%
6M
5.48%
1Y
17.44%
3Y*
15.01%
5Y*
10.11%
10Y*

NVDO

1D
0.00%
1M
1.57%
YTD
16.35%
6M
18.36%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JANZ vs. NVDO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JANZ and NVDO is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2025

0.58

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JANZ vs. NVDO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JANZ
JANZ Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
JANZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JANZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
JANZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
JANZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
JANZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JANZ vs. NVDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF (JANZ) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JANZNVDODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.88

JANZ vs. NVDO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JANZ vs. NVDO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JANZ drawdown since its inception was -18.11%, which is greater than NVDO's maximum drawdown of -16.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANZ and NVDO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JANZNVDODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.11%

-16.25%

-1.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.52%

-4.73%

+2.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.47%

-4.97%

+1.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

Volatility

JANZ vs. NVDO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JANZNVDODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.00%

32.12%

-22.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.23%

32.12%

-18.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.01%

32.12%

-19.11%

JANZ vs. NVDO - Expense Ratio Comparison

JANZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDO's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

JANZ vs. NVDO - Dividend Comparison

JANZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, less than NVDO's 14.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
JANZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF
1.34%1.42%2.70%2.58%0.21%4.52%
NVDO
Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF
14.32%16.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JANZ and NVDO have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NVDO is cheaper at 0.77% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NVDO is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for JANZ.

NVDO has the higher dividend yield at 14.32%, compared with 1.34% for JANZ.

They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for JANZ and 0.77% for NVDO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JANZ and NVDO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer