JANZ vs. QBUL

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

JANZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF) and QBUL (TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JANZ is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by TrueShares, while QBUL is a Options Trading fund actively managed by TrueShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JANZ returned 19.50% vs 4.70% for QBUL. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

JANZ vs. QBUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF (JANZ) and TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF (QBUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JANZ achieves a 7.23% return, which is significantly higher than QBUL's 1.54% return.

JANZ

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: 0.06%
• YTD: 7.23%
• 6M: 6.71%
• 1Y: 19.50%
• 3Y*: 15.42%
• 5Y*: 10.40%
• 10Y*: —

QBUL

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: -0.54%
• YTD: 1.54%
• 6M: 1.75%
• 1Y: 4.70%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JANZ vs. QBUL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
JANZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF	7.23%	12.47%	6.19%
QBUL TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF	1.54%	4.87%	0.58%

Correlation

The correlation between JANZ and QBUL is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2024	0.67

The correlation between JANZ and QBUL shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (all time) to 0.79 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

JANZ vs. QBUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JANZ

JANZ Risk / Return Rank: 62
JANZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
JANZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
JANZ Omega Ratio Rank: 60
JANZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
JANZ Martin Ratio Rank: 68

QBUL

QBUL Risk / Return Rank: 34
QBUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
QBUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
QBUL Omega Ratio Rank: 35
QBUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
QBUL Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JANZ vs. QBUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF (JANZ) and TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF (QBUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JANZ	QBUL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.97	1.21	+0.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.71	1.70	+1.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.23	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.87	1.93	+0.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.22	3.71	+8.51

JANZ vs. QBUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JANZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is higher than the QBUL Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JANZ and QBUL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JANZ vs. QBUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JANZ drawdown since its inception was -18.11%, which is greater than QBUL's maximum drawdown of -2.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANZ and QBUL.

Drawdown Indicators

	JANZ	QBUL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.11%	-2.45%	-15.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.83%	-2.45%	-4.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.33%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.11%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.47%	-1.24%	-0.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.47%	-0.98%	-2.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.60%	1.27%	+0.33%

Volatility

JANZ vs. QBUL - Volatility Comparison

TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF (JANZ) has a higher volatility of 3.83% compared to TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF (QBUL) at 1.80%. This indicates that JANZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QBUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JANZ	QBUL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.83%	1.80%	+2.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.80%	2.79%	+5.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.95%	3.90%	+6.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.22%	3.92%	+9.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.00%	3.92%	+9.08%

JANZ vs. QBUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JANZ and QBUL have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

JANZ vs. QBUL - Dividend Comparison

JANZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than QBUL's 8.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
JANZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF	1.32%	1.42%	2.70%	2.58%	0.21%	4.52%
QBUL TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF	8.81%	8.94%	1.82%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JANZ and QBUL in my portfolio?

JANZ and QBUL have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JANZ or QBUL?

JANZ has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to QBUL (1.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JANZ dropped -18.11% vs QBUL's -2.45%.

Which ETF is better, JANZ or QBUL?

On 1-year performance, JANZ leads with 19.50% vs 4.70% for QBUL. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, QBUL has been the lower-risk option at 1.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JANZ or QBUL?

Over the 1-year period, JANZ has performed better with a 19.50% return vs 4.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JANZ or QBUL?

JANZ and QBUL have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JANZ or QBUL?

QBUL has the higher dividend yield at 8.81%, compared with 1.32% for JANZ.

What is the main difference between JANZ and QBUL?

JANZ is categorized as Defined Outcome, while QBUL is Options Trading.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JANZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.