JANZ vs. JULB

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

JANZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF) and JULB (Aptus July Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JANZ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for JULB.

Performance

JANZ vs. JULB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF (JANZ) and Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JANZ achieves a 8.83% return, which is significantly higher than JULB's 6.42% return.

JANZ

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 4.41%
• YTD: 8.83%
• 6M: 9.05%
• 1Y: 21.71%
• 3Y*: 16.39%
• 5Y*: 10.97%
• 10Y*: —

JULB

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 2.27%
• YTD: 6.42%
• 6M: 7.18%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JANZ vs. JULB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
JANZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF	8.83%	2.35%
JULB Aptus July Buffer ETF	6.42%	2.56%

Correlation

The correlation between JANZ and JULB is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025	0.93

Return for Risk

JANZ vs. JULB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JANZ

JANZ Risk / Return Rank: 69
JANZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
JANZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
JANZ Omega Ratio Rank: 67
JANZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
JANZ Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JANZ vs. JULB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF (JANZ) and Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JANZ	JULB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.32	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.23	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.21	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.27	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JANZ	JULB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.32	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.94	2.20	-1.26

Drawdowns

JANZ vs. JULB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JANZ drawdown since its inception was -18.11%, which is greater than JULB's maximum drawdown of -5.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANZ and JULB.

Drawdown Indicators

	JANZ	JULB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.11%	-5.24%	-12.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.83%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.33%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.11%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.49%	-0.88%	-2.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.54%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	JANZ	JULB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.38%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.09%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.40%	6.83%	+2.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.14%	6.83%	+6.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.98%	6.83%	+6.15%

JANZ vs. JULB - Expense Ratio Comparison

JANZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than JULB's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

JANZ vs. JULB - Dividend Comparison

JANZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, while JULB has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
JANZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF	1.31%	1.42%	2.70%	2.58%	0.21%	4.52%
JULB Aptus July Buffer ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JANZ and JULB in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, JANZ and JULB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, JANZ or JULB?

On fees, JULB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JANZ or JULB?

JULB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for JANZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JANZ or JULB?

JANZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 0.00% for JULB.

What is the main difference between JANZ and JULB?

They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for JANZ and 0.25% for JULB.