JANW vs. SCHC
JANW (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF) and SCHC (Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JANW is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Allianz, while SCHC is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Custom Developed Small Cap ex-US Liquid Net of Tax (Lux). JANW is actively managed, while SCHC is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JANW returned 8.08%/yr vs 6.10%/yr for SCHC. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JANW charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for SCHC.
Performance
JANW vs. SCHC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JANW achieves a 4.00% return, which is significantly lower than SCHC's 9.25% return.
JANW
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 4.00%
- 6M
- 4.45%
- 1Y
- 12.31%
- 3Y*
- 10.44%
- 5Y*
- 8.08%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHC
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- -2.36%
- YTD
- 9.25%
- 6M
- 11.25%
- 1Y
- 25.49%
- 3Y*
- 17.06%
- 5Y*
- 6.10%
- 10Y*
- 8.48%
JANW vs. SCHC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JANW AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF | 4.00% | 10.05% | 10.99% | 14.56% | -0.60% | 6.31% |
SCHC Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF | 9.25% | 37.59% | 1.97% | 14.36% | -21.74% | 12.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between JANW and SCHC is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2021 | 0.69 |
The correlation between JANW and SCHC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
JANW vs. SCHC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JANW
SCHC
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
JANW
SCHC
Financial Services
JANW
SCHC
Communication Services
JANW
SCHC
Consumer Cyclical
JANW
SCHC
Healthcare
JANW
SCHC
Industrials
JANW
SCHC
Consumer Defensive
JANW
SCHC
Energy
JANW
SCHC
Utilities
JANW
SCHC
Real Estate
JANW
SCHC
Basic Materials
JANW
SCHC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JANW vs. SCHC — Risk / Return Rank
JANW
SCHC
JANW vs. SCHC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF (JANW) and Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JANW | SCHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.27 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.23 | 1.93 | +1.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.55 | 7.12 | +10.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JANW vs. SCHC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JANW drawdown since its inception was -9.69%, smaller than the maximum SCHC drawdown of -43.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANW and SCHC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JANW | SCHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.69% | -43.94% | +34.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.65% | -12.48% | +8.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.66% | -15.52% | +6.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.69% | -36.48% | +26.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.54% | -3.49% | +2.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.23% | -10.04% | +8.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.67% | 3.38% | -2.71% |
Volatility
JANW vs. SCHC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF (JANW) is 1.31%, while Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) has a volatility of 6.31%. This indicates that JANW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JANW | SCHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.31% | 6.31% | -5.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.83% | 13.88% | -10.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.71% | 16.21% | -11.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.79% | 17.62% | -10.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.67% | 18.02% | -11.35% |
JANW vs. SCHC - Expense Ratio Comparison
JANW has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHC's 0.11% expense ratio.
Dividends
JANW vs. SCHC - Dividend Comparison
JANW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JANW AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHC Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF | 3.35% | 3.66% | 3.72% | 2.94% | 1.78% | 3.02% | 1.62% | 3.23% | 2.51% | 2.73% | 2.01% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JANW and SCHC have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHC has higher volatility (6.31%) compared to JANW (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JANW dropped -9.69% vs SCHC's -43.94%.
On 5-year performance, JANW leads with 8.08% vs 6.10% for SCHC. On fees, SCHC is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, JANW has been the lower-risk option at 1.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JANW has performed better with a 8.08% return vs 6.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHC is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for JANW.
SCHC has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 0.00% for JANW.
JANW is categorized as Options Trading, while SCHC is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Allianz and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for JANW and 0.11% for SCHC.
JANW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JANW and SCHC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer