JANT vs. AJAN
JANT (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jan ETF) and AJAN (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JANT returned 19.82% vs 6.13% for AJAN. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JANT charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for AJAN.
Performance
JANT vs. AJAN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JANT achieves a 6.90% return, which is significantly higher than AJAN's 2.03% return.
JANT
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 2.50%
- YTD
- 6.90%
- 6M
- 8.26%
- 1Y
- 19.82%
- 3Y*
- 16.53%
- 5Y*
- 10.32%
- 10Y*
- —
AJAN
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- 2.03%
- 6M
- 2.43%
- 1Y
- 6.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JANT vs. AJAN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
JANT AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jan ETF | 6.90% | 14.30% | 16.81% |
AJAN Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026 | 2.03% | 6.12% | 7.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between JANT and AJAN is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2024 | 0.77 |
The correlation between JANT and AJAN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JANT vs. AJAN — Risk / Return Rank
JANT
AJAN
JANT vs. AJAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jan ETF (JANT) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026 (AJAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JANT | AJAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.58 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.35 | 2.74 | +0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.58 | 13.81 | +3.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JANT | AJAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.67 | 2.61 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.01 | 1.74 | -0.73 |
Drawdowns
JANT vs. AJAN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JANT drawdown since its inception was -16.18%, which is greater than AJAN's maximum drawdown of -4.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANT and AJAN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JANT | AJAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.18% | -4.11% | -12.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.94% | -2.24% | -3.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.18% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.03% | -0.09% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.67% | -0.29% | -2.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.13% | 0.44% | +0.69% |
Volatility
JANT vs. AJAN - Volatility Comparison
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jan ETF (JANT) has a higher volatility of 1.33% compared to Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026 (AJAN) at 0.65%. This indicates that JANT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AJAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JANT | AJAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.33% | 0.65% | +0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.96% | 2.05% | +3.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.44% | 2.36% | +5.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.31% | 3.80% | +7.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.10% | 3.80% | +7.30% |
JANT vs. AJAN - Expense Ratio Comparison
JANT has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than AJAN's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
JANT vs. AJAN - Dividend Comparison
Neither JANT nor AJAN has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
JANT and AJAN have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JANT has higher volatility (1.33%) compared to AJAN (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JANT dropped -16.18% vs AJAN's -4.11%.
On 1-year performance, JANT leads with 19.82% vs 6.13% for AJAN. On fees, JANT is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, AJAN has been the lower-risk option at 0.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, JANT has performed better with a 19.82% return vs 6.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JANT is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for AJAN.
JANT and AJAN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Allianz and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for JANT and 0.79% for AJAN.
JANT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JANT and AJAN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer